ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
HIF1α and HIF2α immunoreactivity in epithelial tissue of primary and recurrent pterygium by immunohistochemical analysis.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology and tumor microenvironment of ocular surface and orbital tumors on growth and malignant transformation.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are considered to play a significant role in the pathogenesis of pterygium. The aim of this study was to investigate the relative expression or immunoreactivity of HIF1α and HIF2α in the epithelium of primary pterygium, recurrences and healthy conjunctiva.
methodsImmunohistochemical staining was performed with antibodies against HIF1α and HIF2α, respectively, on 55/84 primary pterygium specimens, 6/28 recurrences and 20/20 control tissues (healthy conjunctiva).
resultsImmunohistochemical staining revealed lower epithelial immunoreactivity of HIF1α and HIF2α in both primary pterygium (11% and 38%) and recurrences (18% and 21%) when compared to healthy conjunctival tissue (46% and 66%). Differences between immunoreactivity of HIF1α and of HIF2α in primary pterygium and controls were each highly significant (p < .001). Within the group of primary pterygium, epithelial immunoreactivity of HIF2α (38%) was significantly higher than that of HIF1α (11%). In recurrent pterygium and healthy conjunctiva, immunoreactivity levels of HIF2α were higher than those of HIF1α as well; however, differences between both isoforms were not significant.
conclusionOur study shows evidence that the higher expressed epithelial HIF2α, rather than HIF1α, and the balance between both HIF isoforms might be relevant factors associated with pathogenesis of primary pterygium. Modulation of HIF2α levels and activity may thus offer a new therapeutic approach to the treatment of advancing pterygium where the initial stage with its HIF1-peak has already passed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.