Observational studyScientific reports2023
Clinical outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a cohort study of patients with care delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to both intentional and unintentional care delay among age-related neovascular macular degeneration (nvAMD) patients. Prior studies have demonstrated that patients who discontinue nvAMD treatment for prolonged intervals are at high risk for vision loss, but less is known regarding shorter-term delay, such as during the height of the pandemic. Previous studies have looked at COVID-19 related delay in care and have shown a loss of visual acuity (VA) among these patients, but studies are limited by short follow-up or insufficient comparisons. This was an observational cohort study of nvAMD patients from March 1, 2019, through July 1, 2021, who experienced care delay. VA was modeled using a linear longitudinal mixed-effects model comparing historic data pre-lockdown to data post-lockdown. Covariates included baseline anatomic variables, demographic variables, and time intervals (treatment interval, delay interval). Secondary anatomic and treatment outcomes were modeled using a multilevel binary logistic regression model. 163 eyes among 116 patients were included. Initial longitudinal mixed-effects models found that although overall VA decreased at a yearly rate, when comparing pre-lockdown and post-lockdown time periods, VA slopes were not statistically different. Single-covariate longitudinal models showed that age, sex, and delay interval significantly affected VA slope. The multivariate longitudinal model found that a longer delay interval significantly decreased rate of VA loss. Multilevel binary logistic regression models showed a significant increase in odds of anti-VEGF treatment, presence of subretinal fluid, and macular hemorrhages in the post-lockdown period. Overall, when compared to historic data, rate of VA loss among our cohort did not vary significantly in pre-versus post-lockdown time periods, although treatment and anatomic variables did worsen post-lockdown suggesting that patients may be appropriately delayed but this comes at the risk of increased need for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.