Trial reportNeurology2023
Minimally Invasive Surgery With Thrombolysis for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation: Bayesian Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01827046 (Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Rt-PA for ICH Evacuation Phase III), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Rt-PA for ICH Evacuation Phase III
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Association Between High-Density Lipoprotein-to-Low-Density Lipoprotein Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Results From a Multicenter Prospective Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Efficacy of rt-PA versus Urokinase in early time windows for minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation and exploratory TAFI pharmacogenomics.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Article
- Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Minimally invasive surgery for bilateral large basal ganglia hemorrhage: a rare case report and insights from literature.AME case reports · 2025Article
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Keep It Simple.Stroke · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesBayesian analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can extend the value of trial data beyond interpretations based on conventional
methodsMISTIE-3 was a multicenter phase 3 RCT designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the MISTIE intervention. Five hundred and six adults (18 years or older) with spontaneous, nontraumatic, supratentorial ICH of ≥30 mL were randomized to receive either the MISTIE intervention (n = 255) or standard medical care (n = 251). We provide Bayesian-derived estimates of the effect of the MISTIE intervention on achieving a good 365-day modified Rankin Scale score (mRS score 0-3) as relative risk (RR) and absolute risk difference (ARD), and the probabilities that these treatment effects are greater than prespecified thresholds. We used 2 sets of prior distributions: (1) reference priors, including minimally informative, enthusiastic, and skeptical priors, and (2) data-derived prior distribution, using a hierarchical random effects model. We additionally evaluated the potential effects of the MISTIE intervention on 180-day and 30-day mRS and 365-, 180-, and 30-day mortality using data-derived priors.
resultsThe Bayesian-derived probability that MISTIE intervention has any beneficial effect (RR >1) on achieving a good 365-day mRS score was 70% using minimally informative prior, 87% with enthusiastic prior, 68% with skeptical prior, and 73% with data-derived prior. However, these probabilities were ≤55% for RR >1.10 and 0% for RR >1.52 across a range of priors. The probabilities of achieving RR >1 for 180- and 30-day mRS scores are 65% and 80%, respectively. Furthermore, the probabilities of achieving RR <1 for 365-, 180-, and 30-day mortality are 93%, 98%, and 99%, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our exploratory analyses indicate that across a range of priors, the Bayesian-derived probability of MISTIE intervention having any beneficial effect on 365-day mRS for patients with ICH is between 68% and 87%. These analyses do not change the frequentist-based interpretation of the trial. However, unlike the frequentist TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01827046. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) + recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) does not significantly improve functional outcome in patients with ICH. However, this study lacks the precision to exclude a potential benefit of MIS + rt-PA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.