Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37683305›Full record

ArticlePsychoneuroendocrinology2023

Linking maternal disrupted interaction and infant limbic volumes: The role of infant cortisol output.

Jennifer E Khoury, Banu Ahtam, Yangming Ou, Emma Jenkins, Torsten Klengel, Michelle Bosquet Enlow, Ellen Grant, Karlen Lyons-Ruth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Imaging biomarkers in functional neurological disorders.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Maternal caregiving moderates relations between maternal childhood maltreatment and infant cortisol regulation.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Article
  6. Is neglect the first form of threat?Attachment & human development · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer E KhouryDepartment of Psychology, Mount Saint Vincent University, Canada. Electronic address: Jennifer.khoury@msvu.ca.
Banu AhtamFetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging & Developmental Science Center, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Yangming OuFetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging & Developmental Science Center, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States; Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Emma JenkinsBoston Children's Hospital, United States.
Torsten KlengelDepartment of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Michelle Bosquet EnlowDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Ellen GrantFetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging & Developmental Science Center, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Karlen Lyons-RuthDepartment of Psychiatry, Cambridge Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Boston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · USMount Saint Vincent University · CA

Funding

Neurobiology of Mothering and Infant StressR01HD079484 · NICHD · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI BOSQUET ENLOW, MICHELLE A, GRANT, PATRICIA ELLEN · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a large animal literature documenting the role of low maternal nurturance and elevated glucocorticoid production on offspring limbic development, these pathways have not yet been assessed during human infancy. Informed by animal models, the present study examined whether 1) maternal disrupted interaction is related to infant cortisol levels, 2) infant cortisol levels are associated with infant limbic volumes, and 3) infant cortisol levels mediate associations between maternal disrupted interaction and infant limbic volumes. Participants included 57 mother-infant dyads. Infant saliva was measured at one time point before and two time points after the Still-Face Paradigm (SFP) at age 4 months. Five aspects of maternal disrupted interaction were coded during the SFP reunion episode. Between 4 and 25 months (M age = 11.74 months, SD = 6.12), under natural sleep, infants completed an MRI. Amygdala and hippocampal volumes were calculated via automated segmentation. Results indicated that 1) maternal disrupted interaction, and specifically disoriented interaction, with the infant was associated with higher infant salivary cortisol (AUCg) levels during the SFP, 2) higher infant AUCg was related to enlarged bilateral amygdala and hippocampal volumes, and 3) infant AUCg mediated the relation between maternal disrupted interaction and infant amygdala and hippocampal volumes. Findings are consistent with controlled animal studies and provide evidence of a link between increased cortisol levels and enlarged limbic volumes in human infants. Results further suggest that established interventions to decrease maternal disrupted interaction could impact both infant cortisol levels and infant limbic volumes.

Indexed as

HydrocortisoneMothersAmygdalaFemaleHippocampusHumansInfantSocial BehaviorHydrocortisoneAmygdala volumeCortisolHippocampal volumeInfancyMaternal behavior

Identifiers

PMID37683305
PMCPMC12879725
OpenAlexW4386319009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.