Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37682995›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Observational and model evidence together support wide-spread exposure to noncompensable heat under continued global warming.

Carter M Powis, David Byrne, Zachary Zobel, Kelly N Gassert, A C Lute, Christopher R Schwalm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Ten new insights in climate science 2024.One earth (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Validating new limits for human thermoregulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Closer limits to human tolerance of global heat.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carter M PowisEnvironmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2391-824X
David ByrneWoodwell Climate Research Center, Woods Hole, Falmouth, MA, USA.
Zachary ZobelWoodwell Climate Research Center, Woods Hole, Falmouth, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2601-4841
Kelly N GassertWoodwell Climate Research Center, Woods Hole, Falmouth, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-0493-1028
A C LuteWoodwell Climate Research Center, Woods Hole, Falmouth, MA, USA.
Christopher R SchwalmWoodwell Climate Research Center, Woods Hole, Falmouth, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5035-5681

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As our planet warms, a critical research question is when and where temperatures will exceed the limits of what the human body can tolerate. Past modeling efforts have investigated the 35°C wet-bulb threshold, proposed as a theoretical upper limit to survivability taking into account physiological and behavioral adaptation. Here, we conduct an extreme value theory analysis of weather station observations and climate model projections to investigate the emergence of an empirically supported heat compensability limit. We show that the hottest parts of the world already experience these heat extremes on a limited basis and that under moderate continued warming parts of every continent, except Antarctica, will see a rapid increase in their extent and frequency. To conclude, we discuss the consequences of the emergence of this noncompensable heat and the need for incorporating different critical thermal limits into heat adaptation planning.

Identifiers

PMID37682995
PMCPMC10491292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.