Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37682961›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Clinical presentation, microbiology, and prognostic factors of prosthetic valve endocarditis. Lessons learned from a large prospective registry.

Antonio Ramos-Martínez, Fernando Domínguez, Patricia Muñoz, Mercedes Marín, Álvaro Pedraz, Mª Carmen Fariñas, Valentín Tascón, Arístides de Alarcón, Raquel Rodríguez-García, José María Miró and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Mitral valve abscess: echocardiographic imaging, microbiology, management, and outcomes.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio Ramos-MartínezUnit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4840-9425
Fernando DomínguezDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain.
Patricia MuñozDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain.
Mercedes MarínDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University General Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Álvaro PedrazDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University General Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5722-4684
Mª Carmen FariñasDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.
Valentín TascónDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Arístides de AlarcónClinical Unit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, Infectious Diseases Research Group Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBiS), Seville, Spain.
Raquel Rodríguez-GarcíaDepartment of Intensive Medicine, University Hospital Central of Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
José María MiróInfectious Diseases Service, Hospital Clinic-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8057-7755
Josune GoikoetxeaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital de Cruces, Bilbao, Spain.
Guillermo Ojeda-BurgosDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Francesc Escrihuela-VidalUniversity of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jorge Calderón-ParraUnit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain.
GAMES investigators
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria · ESHospital de Cruces · ESInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Cantabria · ESUniversidad de Oviedo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProsthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is a serious infection associated with high mortality that often requires surgical treatment.

methodsStudy on clinical characteristics and prognosis of a large contemporary prospective cohort of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) that included patients diagnosed between January 2008 and December 2020. Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with in-hospital mortality was performed.

resultsThe study included 1354 cases of PVE. The median age was 71 years with an interquartile range of 62-77 years and 66.9% of the cases were male. Patients diagnosed during the first year after valve implantation (early onset) were characterized by a higher proportion of cases due to coagulase-negative staphylococci and Candida and more perivalvular complications than patients detected after the first year (late onset). In-hospital mortality of PVE in this series was 32.6%; specifically, it was 35.4% in the period 2008-2013 and 29.9% in 2014-2020 (p = 0.031). Variables associated with in-hospital mortality were: Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.08-1.23), intracardiac abscess (OR:1.78, 95% CI:1.30-2.44), acute heart failure related to PVE (OR: 3. 11, 95% CI: 2.31-4.19), acute renal failure (OR: 3.11, 95% CI:1.14-2.09), septic shock (OR: 5.56, 95% CI:3.55-8.71), persistent bacteremia (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.21-2.83) and surgery indicated but not performed (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.49-2.89). In-hospital mortality in patients with surgical indication according to guidelines was 31.3% in operated patients and 51.3% in non-operated patients (p<0.001). In the latter group, there were more cases of advanced age, comorbidity, hospital acquired PVE, PVE due to Staphylococcus aureus, septic shock, and stroke.

conclusionsNot performing cardiac surgery in patients with PVE and surgical indication, according to guidelines, has a significant negative effect on in-hospital mortality. Strategies to better discriminate patients who can benefit most from surgery would be desirable.

Indexed as

EndocarditisEndocarditis, BacterialHeart Valve ProsthesisShock, SepticAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRegistries

Identifiers

PMID37682961
PMCPMC10490835
OpenAlexW4386561586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.