Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37682883›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Short-term wind speed forecasting based on a hybrid model of ICEEMDAN, MFE, LSTM and informer.

Wang Xinxin, Shen Xiaopan, Ai Xueyi, Li Shijia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wang XinxinSchool of Management, Wuhan University of Science and Technoloy, Wuhan, China.
Shen XiaopanSchool of Management, Wuhan University of Science and Technoloy, Wuhan, China.
Ai XueyiSchool of Management, Wuhan University of Science and Technoloy, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0452-8091
Li ShijiaSchool of Management, Wuhan University of Science and Technoloy, Wuhan, China.
Wuhan University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wind energy, as a kind of environmentally friendly renewable energy, has attracted a lot of attention in recent decades. However, the security and stability of the power system is potentially affected by large-scale wind power grid due to the randomness and intermittence of wind speed. Therefore, accurate wind speed prediction is conductive to power system operation. A hybrid wind speed prediction model based on Improved Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (ICEEMDAN), Multiscale Fuzzy Entropy (MFE), Long short-term memory (LSTM) and INFORMER is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the wind speed data are decomposed into multiple intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) by ICEEMDAN. Then, the MFE values of each mode are calculated, and the modes with similar MFE values are aggregated to obtain new subsequences. Finally, each subsequence is predicted by informer and LSTM, each sequence selects the one with better performance than the two predictors, and the prediction results of each subsequence are superimposed to obtain the final prediction results. The proposed hybrid model is also compared with other seven related models based on four evaluation metrics under different prediction periods to verify its validity and applicability. The experimental results indicate that the proposed hybrid model based on ICEEMDAN, MFE, LSTM and INFORMER exhibits higher accuracy and greater applicability.

Indexed as

Renewable EnergyWindBenchmarkingCardiac Conduction System DiseaseEntropyHumans

Identifiers

PMID37682883
PMCPMC10490920
OpenAlexW4386536274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.