Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37682792›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2023

Safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib in relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma: final analysis of the MAGNOLIA study.

Stephen Opat, Alessandra Tedeschi, Bei Hu, Kim M Linton, Pamela McKay, Sophie Leitch, Morton Coleman, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Jie Jin, Mingyuan Sun and 16 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03846427 (A Phase 2, Open-label Study of Zanubrutinib), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03846427 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2, Open-label Study of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeiGeneRan2019 to 2022Enrolled68ConditionsMarginal Zone Lymphoma, MZLArmsZanubrutinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 20 institutions in 9 countries.

Stephen OpatMonash Health and Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0308-6458
Alessandra TedeschiASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Bei HuLevine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-4325-0929
Kim M LintonDivision of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3294-1548
Pamela McKayBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3959-9730
Sophie LeitchNorth Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Morton ColemanClinical Research Alliance, Lake Success, NY.
Pier Luigi ZinzaniIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2112-2651
Jie JinThe First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Mingyuan SunInstitute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.
Magdalena Sobieraj-TeagueFlinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Peter BrowettAuckland City Hospital, Grafton, New Zealand.
Xiaoyan KePeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Catherine ThieblemontAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Hemato-oncology, Paris University Diderot, Paris, France.
Kirit ArdeshnaUniversity College London Hospitals/University College London Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Fontanet BijouInstitut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6768-7175
Patricia WalkerPeninsula Private Hospital, Ramsay Health Care, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
Eliza A HawkesOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0376-2559
Shir-Jing HoSt George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5368-8975
Keshu ZhouHenan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5467-1377
Zhiyu LiangBeiGene, Shanghai, China.
Jianfeng XuBeiGene, Ridgefield Park, NJ.
Chris TankersleyBeiGene, San Mateo, CA.
Richard DelarueBeiGene, Basel, Switzerland.
Melannie CoBeiGene, San Mateo, CA.
Judith TrotmanConcord Repatriation General Hospital and University of Sydney, Concord, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8009-4593
Medigene (Germany) · DEAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBCancer Research UK Manchester Institute · GBChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University · CNFlinders Medical Centre · AUFrankston Hospital · AUHenan Cancer Hospital · CNInstitut Bergonié · FRIstituto di Ematologia di Bologna · ITLevine Cancer Institute · USMonash Health · AUNBE Therapeutics (Switzerland) · CHNorth Shore Hospital · NZOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre · AUPeking University · CNSt George Hospital · AUTB Alliance · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary analysis of MAGNOLIA, an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study, demonstrated that the next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor zanubrutinib provided a high overall response rate (ORR) in patients with relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma (R/R MZL), with a favorable safety/tolerability profile. Presented here, is the final analysis of MAGNOLIA, performed to characterize the durability of response and longer-term safety and tolerability. Zanubrutinib (160 mg twice daily) was evaluated in 68 patients with R/R MZL who had received at least 1 anti-CD20-directed regimen. The primary end point was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed ORR. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed ORR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), health-related quality of life, safety, and tolerability. With a median follow-up of 27.4 months, the IRC-assessed ORR was 68.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.6-79.1), with a 24-month DOR event-free rate of 72.9% (95% CI, 54.4-84.9). PFS and OS at 24 months were 70.9% (95% CI, 57.2-81.0) and 85.9% (95% CI, 74.7-92.4), respectively. The zanubrutinib safety profile was consistent with the primary analysis, with no new safety signals observed. Atrial fibrillation/flutter (n = 2 [2.9%]) and hypertension (n = 3 [4.4%]) were uncommon. Neutropenia (n = 8 [11.8%]) was the most common grade ≥3 adverse event. In this final analysis of MAGNOLIA, zanubrutinib demonstrated sustained clinical responses beyond 2 years, with 73% of responders alive and progression free. Zanubrutinib continued to demonstrate a favorable safety/tolerability profile with the additional time on treatment. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03846427.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal ZoneMagnoliaHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPiperidinesPyrazolesPyrimidinesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomePiperidinesPyrazolesPyrimidineszanubrutinib

Identifiers

PMID37682792
PMCPMC10679804
OpenAlexW4386536571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.