Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37682776›Full record

Observational studyThe oncologist2024

Insights of Clinical Significance From 109 695 Solid Tumor Tissue-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiles.

Andreas M Heilmann, Jonathan W Riess, Margaret McLaughlin-Drubin, Richard S P Huang, Meghann Hjulstrom, James Creeden, Brian M Alexander, Rachel L Erlich

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas M HeilmannFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3906-8830
Jonathan W RiessUniversity of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Margaret McLaughlin-DrubinFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Richard S P HuangFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Meghann HjulstromFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
James CreedenFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Brian M AlexanderFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rachel L ErlichFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Foundation Medicine (United States)UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Foundation Medicine, Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFoundationOneCDx is approved in the US and Japan as a companion diagnostic test to identify patients with cancer who may benefit from treatment with 30 drug therapies in the US and 23 in Japan. Tumor profiling with FoundationOneCDx also detects genomic findings with evidence of clinical significance that may inform clinical care decisions beyond companion diagnostic claims. This observational study reports the breadth and impact of clinical decision insights from FoundationOneCDx solid tumor profiles. MATERIALS AND

methodsConsecutive test result reports for patients with solid tumor diagnoses (n = 109 695) were retrospectively analyzed for clinically significant predictive, prognostic, and diagnostic genomic alterations and signatures, determined in accordance with professional guidelines. Interventional clinical trials with targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors were matched to tumor profiles based on evidence that the genomic finding may be an actionable, investigational, or hypothetical target in the patient's tumor type.

resultsIn 14 predefined cancer types (80.7% of analyzed solid tumors), predictive, prognostic, and diagnostic markers were reported in 47.6%, 13.2%, and 4.5% of samples, respectively, accounting for a total of 51.2% of tumor profiles. Pan-cancer predictive markers of tumor mutational burden (TMB) of 10 or more mutations per megabase, high microsatellite instability (MSI), or NTRK1/2/3 fusions were observed in 15.6%, 2.0%, and 0.1% of solid tumors, respectively. Most solid tumor profiles (89.2%) had genomic results that could theoretically inform decisions on the selection of immunotherapy and targeted therapy clinical trials.

conclusionFor this real-world population of patients with FoundationOneCDx solid tumor profiles in the routine course of clinical care, clinically significant findings were reported for approximately half of patients with genomic results.

Indexed as

Clinical RelevanceNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, Tumorcomprehensive genomic profilingin vitro diagnosticnext generation sequencingoncologyprecision medicinesolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID37682776
PMCPMC10836312
OpenAlexW4386531533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.