Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37682721›Full record

Trial reportEnvironmental health perspectives2023

The Effect of Individual or Study-Wide Report-Back on Knowledge, Concern, and Exposure-Reducing Behaviors Related to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.

Katherine E Boronow, Barbara Cohn, Laurie Havas, Marj Plumb, Julia Green Brody

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Environmental health perspectives, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07391397 (Reducing Rural Health Disparities by Empowering People to Minimize PFAS Exposure and Improve Cardiovascular Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07391397 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Reducing Rural Health Disparities by Empowering People to Minimize PFAS Exposure and Improve Cardiovascular Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorMillion Marker Wellness, Inc.Ran2025 to 2026Enrolled183ConditionsEnvironmental Health EffectsArmsBlood Test and Report Back
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Not whether but how: the ethics and Language of reporting back individual results.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine E BoronowSilent Spring Institute, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3243-9005
Barbara CohnPublic Health Institute, Oakland, California, USA.
Laurie HavasParticipant Advisory Council, Child Health and Development Studies, Public Health Institute, Oakland, California, USA.
Marj PlumbPlumbline Coaching and Consulting, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Julia Green BrodySilent Spring Institute, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Ethical and Legal Challenges in Communicating Individual Biomonitoring and PersonR01ES017514 · NIEHS · SILENT SPRING INSTITUTE · PI ADAMKIEWICZ, GARY, BRODY, JULIA GREEN · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
Scaling up access and usability of smartphone tools for reporting chemical biomonitoring resultsR21ES030454 · NIEHS · SILENT SPRING INSTITUTE · PI BRODY, JULIA GREEN, BROWN, PHILIP M. · 2019 to 2020
$412k
Building environmental health literacy: What should people know about endocrine disrupting compounds?R03ES027884 · NIEHS · SILENT SPRING INSTITUTE · PI BRODY, JULIA GREEN · 2018 to 2019
$148k
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017514NIEHS NIH HHS R03 ES027884NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES030454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo make informed decisions about endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), people need functional understanding of exposures and health and an ability to act on their knowledge. The return of biomonitoring results is an opportunity to educate people about EDCs and motivate exposure reduction.

objectivesThis study investigates environmental health knowledge about EDCs, concerns about health effects, and exposure-reducing behaviors before and after the return of individual-level exposure results or only study-wide results.

methodsWomen in the Child Health and Development Studies who were biomonitored for 42 EDCs were randomly assigned to receive a report with personal chemical results or only study-wide findings. We interviewed participants before and after report-back about their knowledge and concerns about EDCs and how frequently they performed exposure-related behaviors. We investigated baseline differences by education and race and examined changes after report-back by race and report type.

resultsParticipants ( DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that participants had foundational knowledge about EDCs and that report-back further built their environmental health literacy. We conclude that future communications should target misconceptions about chemicals regulation in the United States, because information about regulations is crucial for people to evaluate risks posed by consumer product chemicals and decide whether to engage with public policy. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12565.

Indexed as

CommunicationEndocrine DisruptorsBiological MonitoringChildChild HealthEnvironmental HealthFemaleHumansEndocrine Disruptors

Identifiers

PMID37682721
PMCPMC10489892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.