Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37682588›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Digital Application of Clinical Staging to Support Stratification in Youth Mental Health Services: Validity and Reliability Study.

Min K Chong, Ian B Hickie, Shane P Cross, Sarah McKenna, Mathew Varidel, William Capon, Tracey A Davenport, Haley M LaMonica, Vilas Sawrikar, Adam Guastella and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Min K ChongBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4562-731X
Ian B HickieBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8832-9895
Shane P CrossOrygen, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5413-8342
Sarah McKennaBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8560-6399
Mathew VaridelBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1648-8317
William CaponBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6500-9629
Tracey A DavenportDesign and Strategy Division, Australian Digital Health Agency, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4218-9238
Haley M LaMonicaBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6563-5467
Vilas SawrikarSchool of Health and Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8160-0232
Adam GuastellaBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8178-4625
Sharon L NaismithBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9076-2778
Elizabeth M ScottBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3907-0324
Frank IorfinoBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1109-0972
The University of Sydney · AUOrygen · AUUniversity of Edinburgh · GBVision Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the demand for youth mental health care continues to rise, managing wait times and reducing treatment delays are key challenges to delivering timely and quality care. Clinical staging is a heuristic model for youth mental health that can stratify care allocation according to individuals' risk of illness progression. The application of staging has been traditionally limited to trained clinicians yet leveraging digital technologies to apply clinical staging could increase the scalability and usability of this model in services.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to validate a digital algorithm to accurately differentiate young people at lower and higher risk of developing mental disorders.

methodsWe conducted a study with a cohort comprising 131 young people, aged between 16 and 25 years, who presented to youth mental health services in Australia between November 2018 and March 2021. Expert psychiatrists independently assigned clinical stages (either stage 1a or stage 1b+), which were then compared to the digital algorithm's allocation based on a multidimensional self-report questionnaire.

resultsOf the 131 participants, the mean age was 20.3 (SD 2.4) years, and 72% (94/131) of them were female. Ninety-one percent of clinical stage ratings were concordant between the digital algorithm and the experts' ratings, with a substantial interrater agreement (κ=0.67; P<.001). The algorithm demonstrated an accuracy of 91% (95% CI 86%-95%; P=.03), a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 93%, and an F

conclusionsThis novel digital algorithm is sufficiently robust to be used as an adjunctive decision support tool to stratify care and assist with demand management in youth mental health services. This work could transform care pathways and expedite care allocation for those in the early stages of common anxiety and depressive disorders. Between 11% and 27% of young people seeking care may benefit from low-intensity, self-directed, or brief interventions. Findings from this study suggest the possibility of redirecting clinical capacity to focus on individuals in stage 1b+ for further assessment and intervention.

Indexed as

clinical stagingdigital health solutiononline diagnosisservice transformationstaged carestratified careyouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID37682588
PMCPMC10517388
OpenAlexW4382134620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.