Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37682498›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2023

Invasive Coronary Assessment in Myocardial Ischemia with No Obstructive Coronary Arteries.

Tatsunori Takahashi, Aakriti Gupta, Bruce A Samuels, Janet Wei

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evaluating Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: Focus on Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA).Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatsunori TakahashiSmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Aakriti GuptaSmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Bruce A SamuelsSmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Janet WeiSmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. janet.wei@cshs.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1311-618X
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is threefold: (i) to give an overview of well-established invasive methods for assessing patients with ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) in the cardiac catheterization laboratory; (ii) to describe the prognostic and treatment implications based on these findings, and (iii) to discuss current knowledge gaps and future perspectives. RECENT

findingsRecent studies have demonstrated that invasive coronary function testing not only allows for risk stratification of patients with INOCA but also guides medical therapy with improvement in symptoms and quality of life. Based on these findings, invasive coronary function assessment is now a class 2a recommendation in the 2021 ACC/AHA chest pain guideline to improve the diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction and to enhance risk stratification. Invasive functional testing for patients with INOCA is well established and easily performed in the catheterization laboratory. Comprehensive invasive assessment is a key to differentiating INOCA endotypes and optimizing both medical therapy and preventive strategies including lifestyle modification.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationCoronary VesselsMyocardial IschemiaCoronary AngiographyHumansPrognosisRisk AssessmentCoronary microvascular dysfunctionINOCAInvasive coronary function testingVasospastic angina

Identifiers

PMID37682498
PMCPMC10564835
OpenAlexW4386529563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.