ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Prediction of Transcription Factor Regulators and Gene Regulatory Networks in Tomato Using Binding Site Information.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- MINI-EX Version 2: Cell-Type-Specific Gene Regulatory Network Inference Using an Integrative Single-Cell Transcriptomics Approach.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Organ-level gene-regulatory networks inferred from transcriptomic data reveal context-specific regulation and highlight novel regulators of ripening and ABA-mediated responses in tomato.Plant communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) represent the regulatory links between transcription factors (TF) and their target genes. In plants, they are essential to understand transcriptional programs that control important agricultural traits such as yield or (a)biotic stress response. Although several high- and low-throughput experimental methods have been developed to map GRNs in plants, these are sometimes expensive, come with laborious protocols, and are not always optimized for tomato, one of the most important horticultural crops worldwide. In this chapter, we present a computational method that covers two protocols: one protocol to map gene identifiers between two different tomato genome assemblies, and another protocol to predict putative regulators and delineate GRNs given a set of functionally related or coregulated genes by exploiting publicly available TF-binding information. As an example, we applied the motif enrichment protocol on tomato using upregulated genes in response to jasmonate, as well as upregulated and downregulated genes in plants with genotypes OENAM1 and nam1, respectively. We found that our protocol accurately infers the expected TFs as top enriched regulators and identifies GRNs functionally enriched in biological processes related with the experimental context under study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.