Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37682461›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2023

Comparison of the Latin America Regulation Landscape and International Reference Health Authorities to Hasten Drug Registration and Clinical Research Applications.

Urimara Argotti, Lada Leyens, Carlos Lisbona, Pilar López, Sergio Alonso-Orgaz, Angel Nevado, Virginia Cozzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Urimara ArgottiInternational Regulatory Policy Department, Latin America Productos Roche, S.A. de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico.
Lada LeyensProduct Development Regulatory, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Carlos LisbonaMedical Writing Department, LIDESEC S.L, Madrid, Spain.
Pilar LópezMedical Writing Department, LIDESEC S.L, Madrid, Spain.
Sergio Alonso-OrgazMedical Writing Department, LIDESEC S.L, Madrid, Spain.
Angel NevadoMedical Writing Department, LIDESEC S.L, Madrid, Spain.
Virginia CozziMedical Affairs Department, Roche Central America, Venezuela, and the Caribbean, Heredia, Costa Rica. virginia.cozzi@roche.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPromptly providing new drugs to fulfill unmet medical needs requires changes in drug development and registration processes. Health Authorities (HAs) considered as reference due to their experience and acknowledgement (Food and Drug Administration [FDA] among others) already consider innovative clinical trial (CT) designs and flexible approval procedures, but Latin America (LATAM) regulations are still far. A comparison was performed to identify gaps. MATERIALS AND

methodsCT requirements for drug Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) and CT approval regulations were compared between LATAM and reference HAs (FDA/European Medicines Agency [EMA]/Health-Canada/Swissmedic/Therapeutic Goods Administration [TGA]/Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency [PMDA]), as of August 2022. Procedure included reference HAs regulations review, item selection, identification in LATAM regulations, and International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines (ICH-E6[R2]/ICH-E8[R1]) implementation revision.

resultsFor MAA, specific application requirements or ICH guideline M4(R4) on common technical document (CTD) adoption are generally stated, and phase-I/III performance is mandatory (explicitly/implicitly). Faster patient access procedures are infrequent: Priority-drug programs, conditional authorizations, or expedited procedures are scarce or non-existent. Regulatory reliance procedures are adopted through different pathways. Regarding CT approval, innovative/complex CT designs are not prohibited but usually omitted. Some countries implemented adapted CT conducting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Early scientific advice meetings (HA-sponsor) are occasionally considered. Most countries are not formally ICH-joined.

conclusionsLATAM regulations must adapt to new regulatory standards (FDA/EMA/ICH) through implementation of frequent updates, reliance/expedited procedures, early HA-sponsor interactions, innovative/complex CTs, mandatory phase-III reaching elimination, and decentralized elements for CT conducting.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug ApprovalHumansLatin AmericaPandemicsPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical PreparationsExpedited regulatory pathwaysInnovative clinical trial designsLatin America regulationsMarketing authorization proceduresNew clinical evidence approachReliance pathways

Identifiers

PMID37682461
PMCPMC10579156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.