Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37682418›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2023

Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based system for echocardiographic estimation of right atrial pressure.

Ghada Zamzmi, Li-Yueh Hsu, Sivaramakrishnan Rajaraman, Wen Li, Vandana Sachdev, Sameer Antani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ghada ZamzmiNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.
Li-Yueh HsuClinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. li-yueh.hsu@nih.gov.
Sivaramakrishnan RajaramanNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.
Wen LiNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Vandana SachdevNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Sameer AntaniNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA. sameer.antani@nih.gov.

Funding

Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for clinical medical image processingZIALM010018 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI ANTANI, SAMEER · 2021 to 2025
$9.0M
Cardiovascular Clinical Section StudiesZICHL006199 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI SACK, MICHAEL · 2017 to 2025
$8.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999NHLBI NIH HHS HL006199NLM NIH HHS LM010018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current noninvasive estimation of right atrial pressure (RAP) by inferior vena cava (IVC) measurement during echocardiography may have significant inter-rater variability due to different levels of observers' experience. Therefore, there is a need to develop new approaches to decrease the variability of IVC analysis and RAP estimation. This study aims to develop a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI)-based system for automated IVC analysis and RAP estimation. We presented a multi-stage AI system to identify the IVC view, select good quality images, delineate the IVC region and quantify its thickness, enabling temporal tracking of its diameter and collapsibility changes. The automated system was trained and tested on expert manual IVC and RAP reference measurements obtained from 255 patients during routine clinical workflow. The performance was evaluated using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis for IVC values, as well as macro accuracy and chi-square test for RAP values. Our results show an excellent agreement (r=0.96) between automatically computed versus manually measured IVC values, and Bland-Altman analysis showed a small bias of [Formula: see text]0.33 mm. Further, there is an excellent agreement ([Formula: see text]) between automatically estimated versus manually derived RAP values with a macro accuracy of 0.85. The proposed AI-based system accurately quantified IVC diameter, collapsibility index, both are used for RAP estimation. This automated system could serve as a paradigm to perform IVC analysis in routine echocardiography and support various cardiac diagnostic applications.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAtrial PressureEchocardiographyHeartHumansPredictive Value of TestsVena Cava, InferiorArtificial intelligenceCollapsibility AnalysisEchocardiographyInferior Vena CavaMachine learningRight Atrial Pressure

Identifiers

PMID37682418
PMCPMC10692014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.