Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37682412›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

The Effect of Sitting Duration on Peripheral Blood Pressure Responses to Prolonged Sitting, With and Without Interruption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nathan T Adams, Craig Paterson, Jillian Poles, Simon Higgins, Lee Stoner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07159152 (Effects of Coffee Versus Hibiscus Tea Consumption During Prolonged Sitting on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07159152 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Coffee Versus Hibiscus Tea Consumption During Prolonged Sitting on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Saud UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsHypertensionArmsCoffee, Hibiscus drink
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Scoping Review of Acute Sedentary Behaviour Studies of People with Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nathan T AdamsSchool of Health and Exercise Science, University of British Columbia, 1238 Discovery Ave, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V9, Canada. adamsnt@mail.ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8156-3056
Craig PatersonDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3125-9712
Jillian PolesVilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2216-5602
Simon HigginsDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8554-3116
Lee StonerDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0682-2270
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNew York University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Sitting Interruption and Whole-body Cardiovascular Health: Linking Physiological Responses to Risk BehaviorsR01HL157187 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HANSON, ERIK D · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
Cardiometabolic Disease Prevention in College-based Young Adults: Mapping a Contextual Sedentary Behavior InterventionR01HL162805 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HANSON, ERIK D · 2022 to 2025
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157187NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL162805NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL162805A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA previous meta-analysis reported that: (i) an acute bout of prolonged uninterrupted sitting induces a significant increase in peripheral blood pressure (BP) and (ii) the increase in BP can be offset by interrupting the sitting bout with light aerobic activities such as walking. However, the temporal association between prolonged uninterrupted sitting and BP was not determined. A better understanding of temporality, for example, how long it takes BP to increase, will assist in prescribing sitting interruption strategies.

objectivesWe aimed to determine: (1) the temporal association between the duration of uninterrupted sitting and BP and (2) whether regular sitting interruptions moderate the association between uninterrupted sitting and BP. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus) were searched from inception to July 2022. Reference lists of eligible studies and relevant reviews were also screened. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria for objective (1) were: (i) participants aged ≥ 18 years; (ii) a prolonged sitting bout ≥ 1 h; and (iii) peripheral BP measurements (systolic BP, diastolic BP, and/or mean arterial pressure) at more than two timepoints during the sitting bout. Additional criteria for objective (2) were: (i) the sitting interruption strategy was implemented during the sitting bout (i.e., not prior to engaging in sitting) and (ii) the study included a control (uninterrupted sitting) condition or group. APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsThere were 1555 articles identified, of which 33 met inclusion criteria for objective (1). Of those articles, 20 met inclusion criteria for objective (2). To investigate the effect of sitting duration on the BP response, unstandardized b coefficients (mmHg/h) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a three-level mixed-effect meta-regression.

resultsIncreased sitting duration was positively associated with systolic BP (b = 0.42 mmHg/h, 95% CI 0.18-0.60), diastolic BP (b = 0.24 mmHg/h, 95% CI 0.06-0.42), and mean arterial pressure (b = 0.66 mmHg/h, 95% CI 0.36-0.90). In trials where sitting was interrupted, there was a significant decrease in systolic BP (b = - 0.24 mmHg/h, 95% CI - 0.42 to - 0.06) and diastolic BP (b = - 0.24 mmHg/h, 95% CI - 0.42 to - 0.12), and a non-significant change in mean arterial pressure (p = 0.69).

conclusionsIncreased uninterrupted sitting duration results in greater increases in BP; however, regularly interrupting sitting may offset negative effects.

Indexed as

Blood PressureExerciseArterial PressureHumansHypertensionWalking

Identifiers

PMID37682412
PMCPMC10872309
OpenAlexW4386529540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.