ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2024
Cerebellar Nuclei Receiving Orofacial Proprioceptive Signals through the Mossy Fiber Pathway from the Supratrigeminal Nucleus in Rats.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thalamic projections from the cerebellar nuclei receiving proprioceptive signals from the jaw muscles in rats.Brain structure & function · 2026Article
- Long-range circuit of the mouse spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Projections from Regions of the Cerebellar Nuclei Receiving Jaw Muscle Proprioceptive Signals to Trigeminal Motoneurons and Their Premotoneurons in the Rat Pons and Medulla.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proprioception from muscle spindles is necessary for motor function executed by the cerebellum. In particular, cerebellar nuclear neurons that receive proprioceptive signals and send projections to the lower brainstem or spinal cord play key roles in motor control. However, little is known about which cerebellar nuclear regions receive orofacial proprioception. Here, we investigated projections to the cerebellar nuclei from the supratrigeminal nucleus (Su5), which conveys the orofacial proprioception arising from jaw-closing muscle spindles (JCMSs). Injections of an anterograde tracer into the Su5 resulted in a large number of labeled axon terminals bilaterally in the dorsolateral hump (IntDL) of the cerebellar interposed nucleus (Int) and the dorsolateral protuberance (MedDL) of the cerebellar medial nucleus. In addition, a moderate number of axon terminals were ipsilaterally labeled in the vestibular group Y nucleus (group Y). We electrophysiologically detected JCMS proprioceptive signals in the IntDL and MedDL. Retrograde tracing analysis confirmed bilateral projections from the Su5 to the IntDL and MedDL. Furthermore, anterograde tracer injections into the external cuneate nucleus (ECu), which receives other proprioceptive input from forelimb/neck muscles, resulted in only a limited number of ipsilaterally labeled terminals, mainly in the dorsomedial crest of the Int and the group Y. Taken together, the Su5 and ECu axons almost separately terminated in the cerebellar nuclei (except for partial overlap in the group Y). These data suggest that orofacial proprioception is differently processed in the cerebellar circuits in comparison to other body-part proprioception, thus contributing to the executive function of orofacial motor control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.