ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2023
Exploring the efficacy of
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis, clinical assessment, and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: a Brazilian multidisciplinary consensus.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Correlation between dual-time-pointQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Correlation of PET/CT Maximal Standardized Uptake Values with Clinicopathologic Parameters of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
- Prognostic Role of Mitotic Index in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Potential Clinical Implications for Very Early Stage Disease.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe sensitivity of [
methods112 HCC lesions from 109 patients detected by
resultsIn the training cohort, group A1 lesions demonstrated a higher Ki-67 index (%, 40.00 [30.00, 57.50] vs. 10.00 [5.00, 28.75], p<0.001) than group A0, the positive correlation between FDG-avidity and Ki-67 index was revealed by multivariate analysis, OR=1.040, 95% CI of OR [1.004-1.077], p=0.030. The calculated cut-off value was 17.5% using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.834 and 95% CI [0.742-0.926], p<0.001. These findings were further validated in the independent validation cohort, with similar results (AUC=0.875, 95% CI [0.750-1.000], p<0.001).
conclusionIn comparison to tumor differentiation, Ki-67 index demonstrates a stronger association with FDG-avidity in HCC tumors, and when the Ki-67 index exceeds 17.5%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.