ArticleLa Tunisie medicale2023
The Covid 19 Pandemic learning strategy: From traditional simulation to online simulation.
Article in La Tunisie medicale, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn Tunisia, during the COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face teaching was replaced by online teaching.
aimThis study aimed to compare three teaching periods: face-to-face teaching in October 2020, screen-based simulation in November 2020 and screen-based simulation in April 2021.
methodsIt was a comparison of the three periods of face-to-face teaching "October 2020" versus online teaching "November 2020" versus "April 2021" online teaching using Chi-square and Fisher Exact test when appropriate for categorical variables and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for quantitative variables. During the April 2021 period, we introduced knowledge assessment through pre- and post-tests. The interactivity was facilitated by the questions and answers with the "Google forms" and the simulation session performed by the facilitator guided by the remote learners. The main criterion was "Overall satisfaction".
resultsFace-to-face teaching was superior to online teaching using screen-based simulation in terms of overall satisfaction, educational goal achievement, behavior change and recommendation. The online teaching in April 2021 was superior to the online teaching in November 2020 in terms of satisfaction and recommendation rates. This was probably due to the interactivity of the Google forms questionnaire and the simulation by the facilitator guided by remote learners.
conclusionFace-to-face teaching was superior to online teaching in terms of overall satisfaction, educational goals achievement, behavior change and recommendation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37682261PMC11099929What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.