Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37681891›Full record

ReviewCells2023

Cancer Vaccine Therapeutics: Limitations and Effectiveness-A Literature Review.

Mariusz Kaczmarek, Justyna Poznańska, Filip Fechner, Natasza Michalska, Sara Paszkowska, Adrianna Napierała, Andrzej Mackiewicz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
31.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Localization of the Complement C1q-Binding Site onTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariusz KaczmarekDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6282-3251
Justyna PoznańskaScientific Society of Cancer Immunology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznań, Poland.
Filip FechnerScientific Society of Cancer Immunology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznań, Poland.
Natasza MichalskaScientific Society of Cancer Immunology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznań, Poland.
Sara PaszkowskaScientific Society of Cancer Immunology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznań, Poland.
Adrianna NapierałaScientific Society of Cancer Immunology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznań, Poland.
Andrzej MackiewiczDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5574-6609
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in tumor microenvironment-associated cancer vaccine therapies. These innovative treatments aim to activate and enhance the body's natural immune response against cancer cells by utilizing specific antigens present in the tumor microenvironment. The goal is to achieve a complete clinical response, where all measurable cancer cells are either eliminated or greatly reduced in size. With their potential to revolutionize cancer treatment, these therapies represent a promising avenue for researchers and clinicians alike. Despite over 100 years of research, the success of therapeutic cancer vaccines has been variable, particularly in advanced cancer patients, with various limitations, including the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment, the presence of immunosuppressive cells, and the potential for tumor escape mechanisms. Additionally, the effectiveness of these therapies may be limited by the variability of the patient's immune system response and the difficulty in identifying appropriate antigens for each patient. Despite these challenges, tumor microenvironment-targeted vaccine cancer therapies have shown promising results in preclinical and clinical studies and have the potential to become a valuable addition to current cancer treatment and "curative" options. While chemotherapeutic and monoclonal antibody treatments remain popular, ongoing research is needed to optimize the design and delivery of these therapies and to identify biomarkers that can predict response and guide patient selection. This comprehensive review explores the mechanisms of cancer vaccines, various delivery methods, and the role of adjuvants in improving treatment outcomes. It also discusses the historical background of cancer vaccine research and examines the current state of major cancer vaccination immunotherapies. Furthermore, the limitations and effectiveness of each vaccine type are analyzed, providing insights into the future of cancer vaccine development.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesNeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansImmunotherapyAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAntibodies, MonoclonalCancer Vaccinesbacterial-basedcancer vaccinecell-baseddendritic cellgenetic vaccineimmunotherapypeptide vaccinetumor microenvironmentviral-basedwhole-cell

Identifiers

PMID37681891
PMCPMC10486481
OpenAlexW4386220201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.