Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37681790›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Post-Natal Short-Term Home Visiting Programs: An Overview and a Volunteers-Based Program Pilot.

Daphna Gross Manos, Noha Gaber Bader, Ayala Cohen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daphna Gross ManosSocial Work Department, Tel Hai Academic College, Qiryat Shemona 1220800, Israel.
Noha Gaber BaderDepartment of Education, Tel Hai Academic College, Qiryat Shemona 1220800, Israel.
Ayala CohenSocial Work Department, Tel Hai Academic College, Qiryat Shemona 1220800, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3630-575X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-natal home visits have been shown to be one of the most effective ways to prevent child maltreatment and reduce risks among children. Unfortunately, these programs tend to be expensive and thus not accessible or practical in many contexts. To address this problem, this paper reviews the literature on home visits conducted shortly after giving birth, considering different types of programs and their outcomes, while focusing on short-term and volunteer-based programs, two approaches that can answer the gap in accessibility. It then introduces a new, innovative, short-term, home visiting program that was developed in Israel. This post-natal program is uniquely structured as volunteer-based to allow it to be culturally informed and inexpensive and therefore accessible to municipalities. The paper describes how experts in the field developed the program and how the volunteers were trained. It elaborates on the protocol for the three defined home visits, each with a specific focus: (1) preventing risks at home, (2) providing parents with emotional support and tools to deal with stress, and (3) connecting them to community resources. We detail the pilot implementation process and some of the challenges that arise. Finally, we describe the design of the evaluation study that is currently collecting data in an Arab town in the north of Israel, with a final discussion on insights gained thus far from the overall process in light of the literature.

Indexed as

ArabsChild AbuseChildFemaleHouse CallsHumansIsraelPregnancyPregnancy Outcomechild abuse and neglectchild injurychild maltreatmenthome visitingpost-natal

Identifiers

PMID37681790
PMCPMC10487603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.