Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37681574›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Longitudinal effects of oral administration of antimicrobial drugs on fecal microbiota of horses.

Diego Gomez, Ramiro Toribio, Benjamin Caddey, Marcio Costa, Stephanie Vijan, Katarzyna Dembek

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Equine botulism.Equine veterinary journal · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reproductive Tract Microbiota of Mares.Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Diego GomezDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7495-4868
Ramiro ToribioDepartment of Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9063-540X
Benjamin CaddeyFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Marcio CostaFaculté de Médecine Vétérinaire - Département de Biomédecine Vétérinaire, University of Montreal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5067-7501
Stephanie VijanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Katarzyna DembekDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8499-5054
The Ohio State University · USCegep de Saint Hyacinthe · CANorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

Boehringer-Ingelheim Vetmedica Advancement in Equine Research Initiative Fund 60048069Equine Research Funds of The Ohio State University GR100639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial drug-associated diarrhea (AAD) is the most common adverse effect in horses receiving antimicrobials. Little information on how oral administration of antimicrobials alters intestinal microbiota in horses is available.

objectiveInvestigate changes of the fecal microbiota in response to oral administration of antimicrobials. ANIMALS: Twenty healthy horses.

methodsProspective, longitudinal study. Horses were randomly assigned to 4 groups comprising 4 horses each: group 1 (metronidazole); group 2 (erythromycin); group 3 (doxycycline); group 4 (sulfadiazine/trimethoprim, SMZ-TMP); and group 5 (control). Antimicrobials were administered for 5 days. Fecal samples were obtained before (day 0) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 30 days of the study period. Fecal microbiota was characterized by high throughput sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA.

resultsHorses remained healthy throughout the study. Richness and diversity in doxycycline, erythromycin, and metronidazole, but not SMZ-TMP groups, was significantly lower (P < .05) at multiple time points after administration of antimicrobials compared with samples from day 0. Main changes in the microbiota were observed during the time of antimicrobial administration (day 2-5; weighted and unweighted UniFrac PERMANOVA P < .05). Administration of erythromycin, doxycycline and, to a lesser extent, metronidazole produced a pronounced alteration in the microbiota compared with day 0 samples by decreasing the abundance of Treponema, Fibrobacter, and Lachnospiraceae and increasing Fusobacterium and Escherichia-Shigella. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Oral administration of antimicrobials alters the intestinal microbiota of healthy horses resembling horses with dysbiosis, potentially resulting in intestinal inflammation and predisposition to diarrhea.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsMicrobiotaAdministration, OralAnimalsDiarrheaDoxycyclineErythromycinHorsesLongitudinal StudiesMetronidazoleProspective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16STrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationAnti-Infective AgentsDoxycyclineErythromycinMetronidazoleRNA, Ribosomal, 16STrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combinationantimicrobial-associated diarrheacolitisdysbiosisgastrointestinalmacrolides

Identifiers

PMID37681574
PMCPMC10658497
OpenAlexW4386529539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.