Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37681357›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2024

Adherence of PARP inhibitor for frontline maintenance therapy in primary epithelial ovarian cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Ji Hyun Kim, Yumi Lee, Da-Young Kim, Sinae Kim, Sang-Soo Seo, Sokbom Kang, Sang-Yoon Park, Myong Cheol Lim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Symptom burden and symptom clusters in ovarian cancer patients during first-line maintenance therapy: a cross-sectional survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ji Hyun KimCenter for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4746-5572
Yumi LeeDepartment of Nursing, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9341-0364
Da-Young KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9557-7843
Sinae KimBiostatistics Collaboration Team, Research Core Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9900-492X
Sang-Soo SeoCenter for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2381-0965
Sokbom KangCenter for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8428-9555
Sang-Yoon ParkCenter for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8325-6009
Myong Cheol LimCenter for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8964-7158
National Cancer Center · KRNational Cancer Center · USPukyong National University · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HA23C0533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the adherence rate to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and identify factors contributing to the deterioration of adherence at our institution.

methodsThe adherence rate to PARP inhibitors was calculated using self-reported Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale questionnaires from a cross-sectional survey. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors that affected adherence.

resultsOf the 131 respondents, 32 (24.4%) showed non-adherence to PARP inhibitors. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, unemployed or retired status (odds ratio [OR]=4.878; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.528-15.572; p=0.008), patients receiving niraparib (OR=3.387; 95% CI=1.283-8.940; p=0.014), and a lower score on the quality-of-life assessment (EORTC-QLQ-OV28), which reflects a better quality of life (QOC) with a lower symptom burden (OR=1.056; 95% CI=1.027-1.086; p<0.001) were associated with high adherence to PARP inhibitors.

conclusionApproximately one-fourth of patients with ovarian cancer are non-adherent to PARP inhibitors as maintenance treatment for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. The occupational status, type of PARP inhibitor, and QOC may affect adherence to PARP inhibitors.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsQuality of LifeAntineoplastic AgentsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsComplianceOvarian CancerPARP InhibitorSurvey

Identifiers

PMID37681357
PMCPMC10792206
OpenAlexW4386519155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.