Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37681279›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2023

Mini-open Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy versus Standard Posterior Approach for Ankylosing Spondylitis-related Spinal Kyphosis: A Comparative Study.

Gao Si, Weipeng Qiu, Qixian Shen, Yongqiang Wang, Weishi Li, Miao Yu, Yu Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Effectiveness of one-stage posterior eggshell osteotomy and long-segment pedicle screw fixation for ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis combined with acute thoracolumbar vertebral fracture].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gao SiPeking University Third Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing, China.
Weipeng QiuEngineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing, China.
Qixian ShenPeking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Yongqiang WangPeking University Third Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing, China.
Weishi LiPeking University Third Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing, China.
Miao YuPeking University Third Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0788-6372
Yu WangPeking University First Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CN

Funding

Peking University Health Science Center Youth Cultivation Fund BMU2023YFJHPY021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurgical strategy for spinal kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been challenging. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) through a minimally invasive (MI) approach has been developed with promising clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PSO via an MI approach and a standard posterior approach (SPA) for treating AS-related spinal kyphosis.

methodsA total of 41 patients with AS-related spinal kyphosis who underwent PSO through an MI approach (MI surgery [MIS] group: n = 25) or SPA (SPA group: n = 16) between January 2015 and July 2020 were retrospectively included. Spinopelvic parameters were evaluated before the surgery, immediately after the surgery, and at the 2-year follow-up. Clinical data including operative time, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, level of fusion, incision length, bed rest period, length of hospitalization, and surgical complications were compared between the two groups. The Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument-22 (SRS-22) was administered to assess patients' quality of life at the latest follow-up. Comparisons between the two groups were performed using independent sample t-test or Chi-square test.

resultsCharacteristics and baseline kyphosis of the two groups were matched. At the 2-year follow-up, in the MIS group, the average correction values of the sagittal vertical axis and global kyphosis (GK) were 9.5 cm and 44.3°, respectively. Compared with the SPA group, the MIS group had similar correction values and correction losses after surgery. No obvious differences were observed in any radiographic parameters, except for GK, immediately after surgery and at the 2-year follow-up between the two groups (p > 0.05). The MIS group had a significantly shorter operative time, lesser blood loss, lesser transfusion volume, shorter fusion level, and lesser time to mobilization than did the SPA group. Higher average functional activity scores of SRS-22 were obtained in the MIS group than in the SPA group.

conclusionMini-open PSO may be an effective alternative to the SPA for treating AS-related spinal kyphosis, with comparable correction effect, lesser surgical trauma and faster recovery. This comparative study may provide valuable guidance for surgical decision-making and patient counseling.

Indexed as

KyphosisSpinal FusionSpondylitis, AnkylosingSurgical WoundHumansLumbar VertebraeOsteotomyQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeAnkylosing SspondylitisKyphosisMinimally invasive surgeryOsteotomy

Identifiers

PMID37681279
PMCPMC10549849
OpenAlexW4386529881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.