Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37681147›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

A comparison between problem-based conventional learning and creative problem-based learning on self-regulation skills: Experimental study.

Flavia Aurelia Hidajat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Flavia Aurelia HidajatDepartment of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the problem-based learning (PBL) method is a research trend used to improve students' self-regulation skills. This study highlights two methods derived from the PBL method, which applies the PBCL method (problem-based conventional learning) and the CPBL method (creative problem-based learning). Previous research stated that applying the PBCL and CPBL methods is often used to increase students' self-regulation skills; however, no study has compared the two methods to identify a more effective method for maximizing students' self-regulation skills. This study aims to compare students' self-regulation skills between applying PBCL and CPBL. Quasi-experimental methods were used in this experimental research. The research design was a posttest-only control group design. The population was 79 secondary school students in Probolinggo, Indonesia. A mathematics post-test and self-regulation skills questionnaire were the techniques used during data collection. An independent T-test and determination test were used during the data analysis. The results showed a significant difference between students' self-regulation skills in applying the CPBL and PBCL methods (Sig. = 0.000 < 0.05). The CPBL method is more effective than the PBCL method in improving students' self-regulation skills. Educators can use the implications of the results of this study to apply the CPBL method in their lesson plans to maximize students' self-regulation skills.

Indexed as

CreativeCreative problem-based learningProblem-based conventional learningSelf-regulation skills

Identifiers

PMID37681147
PMCPMC10481306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.