ArticleRSC advances2023
Inhibitory selectivity to the AKR1B10 and aldose reductase (AR): insight from molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations.
Article in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preclinical Evaluation of 2-Aminobenzothiazole Derivatives: In Silico, In Vitro, and Preliminary In Vivo Studies as Diabetic Treatments and Their Complications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AKR1B10 is over-expressed in many cancer types and is related to chemotherapy resistance, which makes AKR1B10 a potential anti-cancer target. The high similarity of the protein structure between AKR1B10 and AR makes it difficult to develop highly selective inhibitors against AKR1B10. Understanding the interaction between AKR1B10 and inhibitors is very important for designing selective inhibitors of AKR1B10. In this study, Fidarestat, Zopolrestat, MK184 and MK204 bound to AKR1B10 and AR were used to investigate the selectivity mechanism. The results of MM/PBSA calculations show that van der Waals and electrostatic interaction provide the main contributions of the binding free energy. The hydrogen bonding between residues Y49 and H111 and inhibitors plays a pivotal role in contributing to the high inhibitory activity of AKR1B10 inhibitors. The π-π stacking interaction between residue W112 and inhibitor also plays a key role in the stability of inhibitors and AKR1B10, but W112 should keep its natural conformation to stabilize the inhibitor-AKR1B10 complex. Highly selective AKR1B10 inhibitors should have a bulky moiety like a phenyl group, which can change its binding with ABP in binding with AR and cannot change its binding with AKR1B10. The free energy decomposition shows that residues W21, V48, Y49, K78, W80, H111, R298 and V302 are beneficial to the stability of the inhibitor-AKR1B10. Our work will provide an important
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.