ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023
Standardizing and Centralizing Datasets for Efficient Training of Agricultural Deep Learning Models.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI-Enabled Imaging for Pathogen Detection Under Stress Conditions: A Systematic Review.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Pooled it
- Thermal image segmentation in weedy fields via synthetic RGB-trained models and GAN-based cross-modality alignment.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- YOLOv12-BDA: A Dynamic Multi-Scale Architecture for Small Weed Detection in Sesame Fields.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of Mask-R-CNN and Thresholding-Based Segmentation for High-Throughput Phenotyping of Walnut Kernel Color.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integration of crop modeling and sensing into molecular breeding for nutritional quality and stress tolerance.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in plant science: from image-based phenotyping to yield and trait prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Simulation of Automatically Annotated Visible and Multi-/Hyperspectral Images Using the Helios 3D Plant and Radiative Transfer Modeling Framework.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- More eyes on the prize: open-source data, software and hardware for advancing plant science through collaboration.AoB PLANTS · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, deep learning models have become the standard for agricultural computer vision. Such models are typically fine-tuned to agricultural tasks using model weights that were originally fit to more general, non-agricultural datasets. This lack of agriculture-specific fine-tuning potentially increases training time and resource use, and decreases model performance, leading to an overall decrease in data efficiency. To overcome this limitation, we collect a wide range of existing public datasets for 3 distinct tasks, standardize them, and construct standard training and evaluation pipelines, providing us with a set of benchmarks and pretrained models. We then conduct a number of experiments using methods that are commonly used in deep learning tasks but unexplored in their domain-specific applications for agriculture. Our experiments guide us in developing a number of approaches to improve data efficiency when training agricultural deep learning models, without large-scale modifications to existing pipelines. Our results demonstrate that even slight training modifications, such as using agricultural pretrained model weights, or adopting specific spatial augmentations into data processing pipelines, can considerably boost model performance and result in shorter convergence time, saving training resources. Furthermore, we find that even models trained on low-quality annotations can produce comparable levels of performance to their high-quality equivalents, suggesting that datasets with poor annotations can still be used for training, expanding the pool of currently available datasets. Our methods are broadly applicable throughout agricultural deep learning and present high potential for substantial data efficiency improvements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.