Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680947›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

The global birth prevalence of clubfoot: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tracey Smythe, Sara Rotenberg, Chris Lavy

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prenatal Counseling for Congenital Clubfoot.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tracey SmytheInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Sara RotenbergNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Chris LavyNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Reumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences University of Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Estimates of the birth prevalence of clubfoot in low and middle income settings range from 0.5 to 2 per 1000 births. However, there is currently no estimate of global birth prevalence of clubfoot. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting the birth prevalence of clubfoot across all countries and regions worldwide in the last 10 years. Africa Wide Information, EMBASE, CINAHL, Global Health, LILACS and Medline databases were searched for relevant studies from January 1st 2012 to February 9th 2023. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using the inverse variance method, and a random effects model was applied to account for heterogeneity between studies. Quality appraisal was performed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort studies. This review was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023398410. Findings: The search generated 757 studies. Thirty-five studies from 36 countries and five WHO regions were included. The pooled prevalence of clubfoot was 1.18 per 1000 births (95% CI: 1.00-1.36) based on data from 44,818,965 births. The highest prevalence rates were observed in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in the South-East Asia Region (1.80, 95% CI: 1.32-2.28) and the Africa Region (1.31, 95% CI: 0.86-1.77). We estimate that 176,476 (95% CI: 126,126-227,010) children will be born with clubfoot globally each year. Interpretation: This study provides a comprehensive estimate of the global prevalence of clubfoot and highlights the significant burden of this condition, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The findings underscore the need for improving access to effective treatment and prevention strategies in resource-limited settings. Funding: SR received funds from the Global Clubfoot Initiative and the Rhodes Trust.

Indexed as

Birth defectsBirth prevalenceClubfootCongenital anomaliesCongenital talipes equinovarusGlobalMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37680947
PMCPMC10480528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.