ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023
Effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06903663 (A Multi-Centric, Retrospective, Real-World Study on First-Line Therapy With Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Advanced or Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Romanian Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-Centric, Retrospective, Real-World Study on First-Line Therapy With Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Advanced or Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Romanian Population
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Approved immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: a large-scale meta-analysis and systematic review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Radiologic Response Assessment With RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Liver Transplantation Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: What Do We Need to Know from Clinical and Immunological Perspective?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Conversion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following complete response to transarterial radioembolization combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab.Radiology and oncology · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Innovation Treatment Strategy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients Before Immunotherapy: A Case Series Study in Unselected Patients.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Triple-remodeling of tumor microenvironment through hyaluronidase-assisted folate-targeted lipid nanoparticle-mediated siVEGF/siPD-L1 for enhanced tumor immunotherapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Child-Pugh Class B.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- The role of immunotherapy prior to liver transplantation in advanced or down-staged HCC - timing of transplants, selection of patients, and hurdles to overcome with immunosuppression.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Review
- Article
- Organ-specific delivery of an mRNA-encoded bispecific T cell engager targeting glypican-3 in hepatocellular carcinoma.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Feasibility and Effectiveness of Liver Transplantation following Immunotherapy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver cancer · 2025Article
- Immune checkpoint biology in hepatocellular carcinoma (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- First-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab or durvalumab/tremelimumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a real world, multicenter retrospective study.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Lipid metabolism in cancer cells: Its role in hepatocellular carcinoma progression and therapeutic resistance.Hepatology communications · 2025Review
- Article
- Characterizing immune profiles in hepatocellular carcinoma patients benefiting from pembrolizumab and lenvatinib using machine learning.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Subset of Child-Pugh Score 7 Shows Comparable Survival Outcomes to Child-Pugh Score 6 in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atezolizumab-bevacizumab (atezo-bev) is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, its effectiveness and safety in other populations, including those with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class B cirrhosis, is unclear. Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, were searched from 1st May, 2020 till 5th October, 2022; the last date of access was January 31, 2023. Pooled progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and radiological response rate among patients receiving atezo-bev were compared between patients with CTP-A and CTP-B cirrhosis, with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and among those receiving the drug as first-line and later line therapy. The protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42022364430). Findings: Among 47 studies (n = 5400 patients), pooled PFS and OS were 6.86 (95% CI, 6.31-7.41) and 13.8 months (95% CI, 11.81-15.8), respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were 26.7% (24.6-29.1) and 75.3% (73.1-77.4) using RECIST criteria, and 34% (30.3-37.8) and 73.6% (68.8-78) using mRECIST criteria, respectively. Among those receiving atezo-bev, patients with CTP-B cirrhosis had similar ORRs by RECIST (odds ratio [OR], 1.42 [0.77-2.6]; P = 0.25) and mRECIST criteria (OR, 1.33 [0.52-3.39]; P = 0.53) but shorter PFS (mean difference [MD]:3.83 months [1.81-5.84]) than those with CTP-A cirrhosis. Compared to patients receiving TKIs, those receiving atezo-bev had longer PFS (MD: 2.27 months [0.94-3.5]) and higher ORR (RECIST: OR, 1.44 [1.01-2.04] and mRECIST: OR, 1.33 [1.01-1.75]). Compared to first-line therapy, later-line therapy had lower ORR (RECIST: OR, 1.82 [1.3-2.53]; P < 0.001 and mRECIST: OR, 2.02 [1.34-3.05]) but comparable PFS (MD: 0.58 months [-0.18 to 1.35]) among nine studies. The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events among patients with CTP-A and CTP-B cirrhosis was comparable (OR, 0.89 [0.45-1.74]) as it was for patients receiving atezo-bev and TKIs (OR, 0.86 [0.61-1.2]). Interpretation: Our findings suggest that atezo-bev is safe and effective as first-line systemic therapy for patients with uHCC and CTP-A or CTP-B cirrhosis. Funding: An unsolicited grant from ROCHE Products India Pvt Ltd. was received for publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.