ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023
Artificial intelligence aided precise detection of local recurrence on MRI for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Artificial Intelligence-supported Reading Versus Standard Double Reading for the Interpretation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Local Recurrence for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Randomised Controlled Multicenter Study
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Diagnosing Lymph Node Metastasis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using Histologic Whole Slide Images and Time-dependent Magnetic Resonance Images
Development and Multicenter Validation of a Deep Learning Model Based on Whole Slide Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Nasopharynx and Lymph Nodes to Predict Distant Metastases at Diagnosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in Surveillance Strategies for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Multi-Sequence Fusion MRI Deep Learning Models for Discrimination of Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Osteoradionecrosis.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- Multimodal deep learning-based prediction of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury via anatomical imaging and spatial dose: A multicenter study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-powered audio-omics processing method as an auxiliary diagnostic approach for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Application of Digital Medicine to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Head and Neck Tumors.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma at the Virology Precision Oncology Nexus: Decoding Molecular Alterations for Early Intervention and Therapeutic Innovation.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Assessing the generalizability of artificial intelligence in radiology: a systematic review of performance across different clinical settings.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Review
- Assessing the value of artificial intelligence-based image analysis for pre-operative surgical planning of neck dissections and iENE detection in head and neck cancer patients.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- A coordinate registration-based structured magnetic resonance imaging reporting method for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a preliminary study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted radiology assessment of cancer: a systematic review.BJR artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Cancer: Innovations, Applications, and Future Directions.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Deciphering the Prognostic Efficacy of MRI Radiomics in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: MRI is the routine examination to surveil the recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but it has relatively lower sensitivity than PET/CT. We aimed to find if artificial intelligence (AI) could be competent pre-inspector for MRI radiologists and whether AI-aided MRI could perform better or even equal to PET/CT. Methods: This multicenter study enrolled 6916 patients from five hospitals between September 2009 and October 2020. A 2.5D convolutional neural network diagnostic model and a nnU-Net contouring model were developed in the training and test cohorts and used to independently predict and visualize the recurrence of patients in the internal and external validation cohorts. We evaluated the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of AI and compared AI with MRI and PET/CT in sensitivity and specificity using the McNemar test. The prospective cohort was randomized into the AI and non-AI groups, and their sensitivity and specificity were compared using the Chi-square test. Findings: The AI model achieved AUCs of 0.92 and 0.88 in the internal and external validation cohorts, corresponding to the sensitivity of 79.5% and 74.3% and specificity of 91.0% and 92.8%. It had comparable sensitivity to MRI (e.g., 74.3% vs. 74.7%, Interpretation: The AI model equaled MRI by expert radiologists, and AI-aided MRI by expert radiologists equaled PET/CT. A larger randomized controlled trial is warranted to demonstrate the AI's benefit sufficiently. Funding: The Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program (2015020), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2022A1515110356), and Guangzhou Science and Technology Program (2023A04J1788).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.