Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680944›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Artificial intelligence aided precise detection of local recurrence on MRI for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter cohort study.

Pu-Yun OuYang, Yun He, Jian-Gui Guo, Jia-Ni Liu, Zhi-Long Wang, Anwei Li, Jiajian Li, Shan-Shan Yang, Xu Zhang, Wei Fan and 8 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06356441 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Artificial Intelligence-supported Reading Versus Standard Double Reading for the Interpretation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Local Recurrence for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Randomised Controlled Multicenter Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled10,400ConditionsArtificial Intelligence Supported Image ReviewingArmsAI
NCT06829147 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Diagnosing Lymph Node Metastasis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using Histologic Whole Slide Images and Time-dependent Magnetic Resonance Images

TypeobservationalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsNasopharyngeal Cancinoma (NPC), Lymph Node Metastasis
NCT06831357 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development and Multicenter Validation of a Deep Learning Model Based on Whole Slide Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Nasopharynx and Lymph Nodes to Predict Distant Metastases at Diagnosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

TypeobservationalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsNasopharyngeal Cancinoma (NPC), Distant Metastasis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pu-Yun OuYangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Yun HeDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Jian-Gui GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Jia-Ni LiuDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, The Cancer Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Zhi-Long WangDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China.
Anwei LiCVTE Research, Guangzhou, China.
Jiajian LiCVTE Research, Guangzhou, China.
Shan-Shan YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xu ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Wei FanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Yi-Shan WuDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Zhi-Qiao LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Bao-Yu ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Ya-Nan ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Ming-Yong GaoDepartment of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Wei-Jun ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chuan-Miao XieDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Fang-Yun XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNFirst People's Hospital of Foshan · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CNZhongshan People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: MRI is the routine examination to surveil the recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but it has relatively lower sensitivity than PET/CT. We aimed to find if artificial intelligence (AI) could be competent pre-inspector for MRI radiologists and whether AI-aided MRI could perform better or even equal to PET/CT. Methods: This multicenter study enrolled 6916 patients from five hospitals between September 2009 and October 2020. A 2.5D convolutional neural network diagnostic model and a nnU-Net contouring model were developed in the training and test cohorts and used to independently predict and visualize the recurrence of patients in the internal and external validation cohorts. We evaluated the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of AI and compared AI with MRI and PET/CT in sensitivity and specificity using the McNemar test. The prospective cohort was randomized into the AI and non-AI groups, and their sensitivity and specificity were compared using the Chi-square test. Findings: The AI model achieved AUCs of 0.92 and 0.88 in the internal and external validation cohorts, corresponding to the sensitivity of 79.5% and 74.3% and specificity of 91.0% and 92.8%. It had comparable sensitivity to MRI (e.g., 74.3% vs. 74.7%, Interpretation: The AI model equaled MRI by expert radiologists, and AI-aided MRI by expert radiologists equaled PET/CT. A larger randomized controlled trial is warranted to demonstrate the AI's benefit sufficiently. Funding: The Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program (2015020), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2022A1515110356), and Guangzhou Science and Technology Program (2023A04J1788).

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDiagnosisMagnetic resonance imagingNasopharyngeal carcinomaRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID37680944
PMCPMC10480520
OpenAlexW4386300805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.