Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680841›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Stigmatization and Self-Perception regarding issues related to Mental Health: A qualitative survey from a lower and middle-income country.

Shaffaque Ikhtiar Khan, Muhammad Irfan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shaffaque Ikhtiar KhanShaffaque Ikhtiar Khan, House Officer, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad IrfanProf. Dr. Muhammad Irfan, Department of Mental Health, Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Peshawar Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the understanding of the patients with common mental disorders, towards issues related to their mental health. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted from December 2018 to April 2020. Thirty-four patients, suffering from common mental disorders, were interviewed in public and private sector hospitals of Peshawar. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, translated into English, and themes were generated from their responses. Content analysis was carried out on the data obtained. The themes resulting from each interview were then further comparatively analyzed. Results: The mean age of the sample was 31.9±10.61 years. Most of the patients (n=24, 70.6%) were aware that the nature of their illness was a psychological one with a majority (n=17, 50%) describing it with the symptoms of headache or burden on the head. Most of the patients (n=14, 41.1%) were unaware of the general public opinion towards mental disorders but those who were aware described these with stigmatizing descriptions e.g., "people call them crazy" etc. Most of the patients (n=20, 58.8%) were unaware about their own opinion regarding their illness and some said that they tried to conceal their illness from others. Unfortunately, most of the patients (n=19, 55.8%) were not aware of mental healthcare professionals or the existence of psychiatry as a profession. Conclusion: Stigma, both public and personal, was quite high, which caused patients to feel compelled to conceal their illness. There was also a general lack of knowledge with regard to mental disorders in our society. The general public opinion about mental health professionals was not favorable.

Indexed as

Mental healthNoncomplianceStigma

Identifiers

PMID37680841
PMCPMC10480727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.