Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680740›Full record

ReviewWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2023

Minimizing blood loss and transfusion rate in laparoscopic liver surgery: a review.

Wojciech A Serednicki, Wacław Hołówko, Piotr Major, Piotr Małczak, Michał Pędziwiatr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The impact of obesity on short-term outcomes after the laparoscopic liver resection: a single-institution experience.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Article
  6. Is operation time over the benchmark value a risk factor for worse short-term outcomes after laparoscopic liver resection?Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wojciech A SerednickiDepartment of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Wacław HołówkoDepartment of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr Major2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr Małczak2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Michał Pędziwiatr2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic liver resection has become a standard practice in many surgical wards in elective liver surgery, due to its positive impact on reducing hospital stay and postoperative complications, including lower blood loss and transfusion rate. However, achieving proper hemostasis in liver surgery, due to its vast blood supply, still remains a main concern to surgeons. Therefore, numerous techniques were and are still being developed to further reduce blood loss and transfusion rate. The aim of this literature review was to summarize the best available methods for achieving the minimal blood loss and transfusion rate in laparoscopic liver surgery, according to the newest data.

Indexed as

blood losshemostasislaparoscopic liver surgerytransfusion rate

Identifiers

PMID37680740
PMCPMC10481434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.