Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680711›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2023

A review of the botany, phytochemistry, traditional uses, pharmacology, toxicology, and quality control of the

Panpan Wang, Zhen Wang, Zhanping Zhang, Huiyan Cao, Lingyang Kong, Wei Ma, Weichao Ren

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biomolecules · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Panpan Wang *School of Pharmacy, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Zhen Wang *School of Pharmacy, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Zhanping ZhangSchool of Pharmacy, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Huiyan CaoSchool of Pharmacy, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Lingyang KongSchool of Pharmacy, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Wei MaSchool of Pharmacy, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Weichao RenSchool of Pharmacy, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.
Academic Degrees & Graduate Education · CNHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astragali Radix (Huangqi) is mainly distributed in the Northern Hemisphere, South America, and Africa and rarely in North America and Oceania. It has long been used as an ethnomedicine in the Russian Federation, Mongolia, Korea, Kazakhstan, and China. It was first recorded in the Shennong Ben Cao Jing and includes the effects of reinforcing healthy qi, dispelling pathogenic factors, promoting diuresis, reducing swelling, activating blood circulation, and dredging collaterals. This review systematically summarizes the botanical characteristics, phytochemistry, traditional uses, pharmacology, and toxicology of Astrag

Indexed as

Astragalus memeranaceusbotanyethnopharmacologypharmacologyphytochemistrytoxicologytraditional uses

Identifiers

PMID37680711
PMCPMC10482111
OpenAlexW4386100275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.