ArticleGerms2022
Antimicrobial resistance pattern in clinical
Article in Germs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disarming Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens: Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Induced Plasmid Curing for the Reversal of Resistance and Virulence inInternational journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- Trends in antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic use before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in a university research and practice hospital in Türkiye.Access microbiology · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance Trends, Resistance Mechanisms, and Antibiotic Consumption in COVID-19 Versus Non-COVID-19 Units: A Seven-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A 15-Year One Health Approach to Antimicrobial Resistance in Kuwait from Hospitals to Environmental Contexts: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Genotypic and phenotypic analyses of two distinct sets ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
- Exploring the evolution ofAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Article
- Gram-Negative ESKAPE Bacteria Surveillance in COVID-19 Pandemic Exposes High-Risk Sequence Types ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The study objective was to compare the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in clinical Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted based on AMR profiles of clinical Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. The AMR data represented isolates from five specimen types (body fluids; blood; respiratory; wound, bone, or other tissues; and urine) of patients admitted to four wards (surgical, medical, pediatric, and maternal-postnatal). Tested isolates between January 2019 and February 2020 represented the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period in Kuwait, whereas those from February 2020 until April 2021 represented the 'during COVID-19' period. Results: A total of 1,303 isolates (57.2% Conclusions: No major differences in AMR in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.