Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680621›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Development and external validation of a mixed-effects deep learning model to diagnose COVID-19 from CT imaging.

Joshua Bridge, Yanda Meng, Wenyue Zhu, Thomas Fitzmaurice, Caroline McCann, Cliff Addison, Manhui Wang, Cristin Merritt, Stu Franks, Maria Mackey and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Joshua BridgeInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Yanda MengInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Wenyue ZhuInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Thomas FitzmauriceInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Caroline McCannDepartment of Radiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Cliff AddisonAdvanced Research Computing, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Manhui WangAdvanced Research Computing, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Cristin MerrittAlces Flight Limited, Bicester, United Kingdom.
Stu FranksAlces Flight Limited, Bicester, United Kingdom.
Maria MackeyAmazon Web Services, London, United Kingdom.
Steve MessengerAmazon Web Services, London, United Kingdom.
Renrong SunDepartment of Radiology, Hubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
Yitian ZhaoCixi Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China.
Yalin ZhengInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The automatic analysis of medical images has the potential improve diagnostic accuracy while reducing the strain on clinicians. Current methods analyzing 3D-like imaging data, such as computerized tomography imaging, often treat each image slice as individual slices. This may not be able to appropriately model the relationship between slices. Methods: Our proposed method utilizes a mixed-effects model within the deep learning framework to model the relationship between slices. We externally validated this method on a data set taken from a different country and compared our results against other proposed methods. We evaluated the discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness of our model using a range of measures. Finally, we carried out a sensitivity analysis to demonstrate our methods robustness to noise and missing data. Results: In the external geographic validation set our model showed excellent performance with an AUROC of 0.930 (95%CI: 0.914, 0.947), with a sensitivity and specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.778 (0.720, 0.828), 0.882 (0.853, 0.908), 0.744 (0.686, 0.797), and 0.900 (0.872, 0.924) at the 0.5 probability cut-off point. Our model also maintained good calibration in the external validation dataset, while other methods showed poor calibration. Conclusion: Deep learning can reduce stress on healthcare systems by automatically screening CT imaging for COVID-19. Our method showed improved generalizability in external validation compared to previous published methods. However, deep learning models must be robustly assessed using various performance measures and externally validated in each setting. In addition, best practice guidelines for developing and reporting predictive models are vital for the safe adoption of such models.

Indexed as

COVID-19CTdeep learningdiagnosisimaging

Identifiers

PMID37680621
PMCPMC10481527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.