Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680543›Full record

ReviewACS materials letters2023

Toward

Julia Maibach, Josef Rizell, Aleksandar Matic, Nataliia Mozhzhukhina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS materials letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Probing Buried Interfaces in Batteries: TowardChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mastering Proton Activities in Aqueous Batteries.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Solvation Environment and Interface Dynamics of LiACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia MaibachDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE 412 96, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1339-7804
Josef RizellDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE 412 96, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3812-9902
Aleksandar MaticDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE 412 96, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4414-9504
Nataliia MozhzhukhinaDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE 412 96, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6798-9704

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrode/electrolyte interfaces are the most important and least understood components of Li-ion and next-generation batteries. An improved understanding of interphases in batteries will undoubtedly lead to breakthroughs in the field. Traditionally, evaluating those interphases involves using

Identifiers

PMID37680543
PMCPMC10482148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.