Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680494›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

The limestone spheroids of 'Ubeidiya: intentional imposition of symmetric geometry by early hominins?

Antoine Muller, Deborah Barsky, Robert Sala-Ramos, Gonen Sharon, Stefania Titton, Josep-Maria Vergès, Leore Grosman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antoine MullerComputational Archaeology Laboratory, Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1646-796X
Deborah BarskyInstitut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES-CERCA), Zona Educacional 4, Campus Sescelades URV (Edifici W3), 43007 Tarragona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-0389
Robert Sala-RamosInstitut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES-CERCA), Zona Educacional 4, Campus Sescelades URV (Edifici W3), 43007 Tarragona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7168-824X
Gonen SharonMA Program in Galilee Studies, East Campus, Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1226-2556
Stefania TittonDepartament d'Història i Història de l'Art, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Avinguda de Catalunya 35, 43002 Tarragona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1703-9801
Josep-Maria VergèsInstitut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES-CERCA), Zona Educacional 4, Campus Sescelades URV (Edifici W3), 43007 Tarragona, Spain.
Leore GrosmanComputational Archaeology Laboratory, Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6976-6202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spheroids are one of the least understood lithic items yet are one of the most enduring, spanning from the Oldowan to the Middle Palaeolithic. Why and how they were made remains highly debated. We seek to address whether spheroids represent unintentional by-products of percussive tasks or if they were intentionally knapped tools with specific manufacturing goals. We apply novel three-dimensional analysis methods, including spherical harmonics and surface curvature, to 150 limestone spheroids from 'Ubeidiya (

Indexed as

Lower Palaeolithicspherical harmonicsspheroidsstone ballsthree-dimensional lithic analysis‘Ubeidiya‌

Identifiers

PMID37680494
PMCPMC10480702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.