ArticleCureus2023
Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Prospective, Clinic-Based, Cohort Study From India.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Importance of the inflammasome in gut-brain axis: from pathological driver to therapeutic target.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Inflammatory biomarkers in depression: scoping review.BJPsych open · 2024Article
- Antidepressant Effect of Enzymatic Porcine Placenta Hydrolysate in Repeated Immobilization Stress-Induced Ovariectomized Female Mice.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Patients with major depressive disorder have varying response rates to treatment. Multiple factors such as non-adherence, comorbidity, chronic stressors, and biological factors may be responsible for this variation. Inflammatory (pro and anti) markers have been well studied as a cause for depression, predisposing factors, and a consequence of depression. Among these, interleukins (ILs), interferons, C-reactive protein (CRP), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) have been studied repeatedly. We conducted a pilot study to assess the levels of these inflammatory markers in patients with major depressive disorder. The specific objectives of this study were to compare and correlate changes in pro- and anti-inflammatory markers throughout different phases of depression, including pretreatment and posttreatment periods, and to evaluate the pattern of pro- and anti-inflammatory markers in patients who experienced remission or showed a positive response to treatment. Methodology This was a prospective, clinic-based, cohort study done for a period of one and a half years. Patients aged 18-65 years with depressive disorder per the International Classification of Diseases Tenth Edition and who scored more than 7 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale were included in this study. A total of 81 patients were recruited who were followed up till eight weeks after inclusion. A total of 31 patients completed the eight weeks of follow-up. Levels of IL-10 and TNF-α were assessed at baseline, two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks of follow-up. Results This study tried to compare the levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory markers across pretreatment and various posttreatment phases of depression. Results showed that the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α increased from baseline till eight weeks of follow-up, and levels of IL-10 decreased from baseline till eight weeks of follow-up. However, these changes were not statistically significant. Conclusions This study supports the hypothesis that inflammatory markers can be trait markers of depression rather than the consequence or result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.