Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680352›Full record

ArticleAntibody therapeutics2023

Comparability strategy and demonstration for post-approval production cell line change of a bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305.

Zhouyi Wu, Gangling Xu, Wu He, Chuanfei Yu, Wanqiu Huang, Shirui Zheng, Dian Kang, Michael H Xie, Xingjun Cao, Lan Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibody therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhouyi WuCenter for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing 100022, China.
Gangling XuKey Laboratory of the Ministry of Health for Research on Quality and Standardization of Biotech Products, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing 102629, China.
Wu HeCenter for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing 100022, China.
Chuanfei YuKey Laboratory of the Ministry of Health for Research on Quality and Standardization of Biotech Products, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing 102629, China.
Wanqiu HuangDepartment of Analytical Science, Innovent Biologics, Inc., Suzhou 215123, China.
Shirui ZhengDepartment of Medical Science, Innovent Biologics, Inc., Suzhou 215123, China.
Dian KangDepartment of Drug Discovery, Innovent Biologics, Inc., Suzhou 215123, China.
Michael H XieDepartment of Analytical Science, Innovent Biologics, Inc., Suzhou 215123, China.
Xingjun CaoDepartment of Analytical Science, Innovent Biologics, Inc., Suzhou 215123, China.
Lan WangKey Laboratory of the Ministry of Health for Research on Quality and Standardization of Biotech Products, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing 102629, China.
Kaikun WeiCenter for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing 100022, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-producing cell line could improve the affordability and availability of biotherapeutic products. A post-approval production cell line change, low-titer CHO-K1S to high-titer CHO-K1SV GS-KO, was performed for a China marketed bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305. Currently, there is no regulatory guideline specifically addressing the requirements for comparability study of post-approval cell line change, which is generally regarded as the most complex process change for biological products. Following the quality by design principle and risk assessment, an extensive analytical characterization and three-way comparison was performed by using a panel of advanced analytical methods. Orthogonal and state-of-the-art techniques including nuclear magnetic resonance and high-resolution mass spectrometry were applied to mitigate the potential uncertainties of higher-order structures and to exclude any new sequence variants, scrambled disulfide bonds, glycan moiety and undesired process-related impurities such as host cell proteins. Nonclinical and clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) studies were conducted subsequently to further confirm the comparability. The results demonstrated that the post-change IBI305 was analytically comparable to the pre-change one and similar to the reference product in physicochemical and biological properties, as well as the degradation behaviors in accelerated stability and forced degradation studies. The comparability was further confirmed by comparable PK, pharmacodynamics, toxicological and immunogenicity profiles of nonclinical and clinical studies. The comparability strategy presented here might extend to cell line changes of other post-approval biological products, and particularly set a precedent in China for post-approval cell line change of commercialized biosimilars.

Indexed as

biologicscell line changecomparabilitypost-approvalquality by design

Identifiers

PMID37680352
PMCPMC10481892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.