ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Unplanned Reoperation following Vitreoretinal Surgery.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the incidence of unplanned return to the operating room following vitreoretinal surgery and assess the reasons. Methods: In this retrospective case series, medical records of all patients who underwent vitreoretinal surgery were reviewed to determine the incidence and reasons of early (<30 days postoperatively) and late (≥30 days postoperatively) unplanned reoperations after the surgery. Results: A total of 488 eyes of 468 patients with a mean age of 55.84 ± 18.23 years were included. Fourteen percent (68/488) of eyes required one or more unplanned reoperation following their primary surgery. These include 3.9% (19/488) for the early and 10.0% (49/488) for the late reoperation. The most common primary reason for baseline surgery was rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) without proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR, 38.2%), followed by RD with PVR (23.5%), and tractional RD (TRD, 19.1%). Unplanned reoperations were most common in RD with PVR (19.3%), RRD without PVR (17.2%), and TRD (14.4%). Overall, the most common reasons of the first unplanned reoperation were repeated RD with PVR (27.9%), repeated RD (19.1%), and the presence of silicone oil (SO) in the anterior chamber (AC) (10.3%). For early unplanned reoperations, SO in AC, postoperative endophthalmitis, and persistent hyphema were the most common causes. Repeated RD with PVR was the most prevalent cause of late unplanned reoperations (34.7%). In the multivariate analysis, preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly lower in eyes with unplanned reoperation than in eyes without ( Conclusions: Unplanned reoperation following vitreoretinal surgery is not very common, and occurs mostly in the setting of PVR, RRD, and TRD. Lower preoperative BCVA may indicate an increased chance of future unplanned reoperation(s).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.