Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680225›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2023

Patient-reported pain associated with grid-based transperineal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) software fusion biopsy of the prostate under local anesthesia: a multicenter experience.

Stanisław Szempliński, Hubert Kamecki, Mateusz Mokrzyś, Marek Zawadzki, Bartłomiej Zagożdżon, Małgorzata Dębowska, Roman Sosnowski, Sławomir Poletajew, Piotr Kryst, Łukasz Nyk

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stanisław SzemplińskiSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Hubert KameckiSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Mateusz MokrzyśDepartment of Urology, St. Anna Hospital, Piaseczno, Poland.
Marek ZawadzkiDepartment of Urology, St. Anna Hospital, Piaseczno, Poland.
Bartłomiej ZagożdżonSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Małgorzata DębowskaNałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Roman SosnowskiDepartment of Urology and Oncological Urology, Warmian-Masurian Cancer Center, Olsztyn, Poland.
Sławomir PoletajewSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr KrystSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Łukasz NykSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLSt. Anna Hospital · DEInstitute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biopsy by transperineal (TP) approach is recommended standard for prostate cancer (PC) diagnosis. To avoid pain, patients undergoing TP biopsy may be offered sedation or general anesthesia. Our aim was to investigate the degree of patient-reported pain for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy of the prostate being performed under local anesthesia (LA) and to study for possible factors associated with increased risk of significant pain (SP) in this setting. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed data of consecutive patients without a prior diagnosis of PC who underwent MRI/US software fusion biopsy of the prostate under LA with lidocaine at two centers between May 2020 and April 2022, and who reported their periprocedural pain on a Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (0-10). We defined SP as reported pain score of 6-10. Patient and procedure characteristics together with SP were studied for interdependencies. Results: A total of 299 patients were included. Median pain score was 2 (interquartile range: 2-4), with SP having been reported by 55 (18.4%) patients. Among patient characteristics, only age demonstrated association with SP [odds ratio (OR), per 10 years =0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35-0.80, P=0.003] and patients aged 62 or above were significantly less likely to report SP (OR =0.33, 95% CI: 0.18-0.60, P<0.001). Conclusions: Performing TP MRI/US fusion prostate biopsy under LA is associated with low rates of SP, with the risk being significantly lower in older men. The results of this study can serve as evidence resource for preprocedural counselling in patients especially concerned about the risk of pain.

Indexed as

fusion biopsylocal anesthesiapainProstate cancer (PC)transperineal biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37680225
PMCPMC10481192
OpenAlexW4386170710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.