Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680222›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2023

Immediate gemcitabine bladder instillation following bladder closure during robotic-assisted radical nephroureterectomy: a multi-institutional report of feasibility and initial outcomes.

Mohammed A Said, Hayden Warner, Thomas E Stout, Robert Harrison, Bradley Loeffler, Michael D Stifelman, Vignesh T Packiam, Chad R Tracy, Paul T Gellhaus

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed A SaidDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Hayden WarnerDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Thomas E StoutDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Robert HarrisonHackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Bradley LoefflerHolden Comprehensive Cancer City, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Michael D StifelmanHackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Vignesh T PackiamDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Chad R TracyDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Paul T GellhausDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
University of Iowa · USHackensack University Medical Center · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is common and randomized data supports utilization of prophylactic intravesical mitomycin to reduce recurrence. Recently, gemcitabine has been shown to be safe and effective at reducing recurrence following transurethral resection of bladder tumors. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single, intraoperative gemcitabine instillation immediately following bladder cuff closure during RNU, and to compare outcomes with non-gemcitabine intravesical chemotherapy agents. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients from two high volume centers who underwent robotic-assisted RNU between 2016-2020 and received either 2 g intravesical gemcitabine immediately following bladder cuff closure or non-gemcitabine intravesical chemotherapies [40 mg mitomycin C (MMC) or 50 mg doxorubicin] at the beginning of the procedure. Clinicopathologic factors were compared between cohorts. Bladder recurrence rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: During RNU, 24 patients received gemcitabine and 31 patients received non-gemcitabine chemotherapy. In total, 35% (19/55) of patients experienced a bladder cancer recurrence. There was no significant difference in estimated bladder recurrence-free survival (bRFS) between gemcitabine and non-gemcitabine patient cohorts (P=0.64). By 12 months post-surgery, 25% of patients had experienced bladder recurrence. The estimated 1-year bladder RFS survival was 73% for gemcitabine and 76% for non-gemcitabine chemotherapy. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival did not differ between cohorts. No adverse events potentially attributable to the use of gemcitabine were noted within 30 days postoperatively. Conclusions: Gemcitabine instilled immediately following bladder cuff closure during RNU has similar bRFS rates compared to established chemotherapy agents instilled at the start of surgery.

Indexed as

bladder cuff closureintravesical gemcitabineNephroureterectomyperioperative intravesical chemotherapyupper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37680222
PMCPMC10481194
OpenAlexW4386170761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.