Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680211›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

A cross-institutional evaluation on breast cancer phenotyping NLP algorithms on electronic health records.

Sicheng Zhou, Nan Wang, Liwei Wang, Ju Sun, Anne Blaes, Hongfang Liu, Rui Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sicheng ZhouInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nan WangSchool of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Liwei WangDepartment of AI and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ju SunDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Anne BlaesDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Hongfang LiuDepartment of AI and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Rui ZhangDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

A Translational Informatics Framework to Mine Efficacy and Safety of Dietary SupplementsR01AT009457 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RUI ZHANG · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
SCH: A New Computational Framework for Learning from Imbalanced Biomedical DataR01CA287413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CUI, YING, SUN, JU · 2023 to 2025
$1.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009457NCI NIH HHS R01 CA287413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Transformer-based language models are prevailing in the clinical domain due to their excellent performance on clinical NLP tasks. The generalizability of those models is usually ignored during the model development process. This study evaluated the generalizability of CancerBERT, a Transformer-based clinical NLP model, along with classic machine learning models, i.e., conditional random field (CRF), bi-directional long short-term memory CRF (BiLSTM-CRF), across different clinical institutes through a breast cancer phenotype extraction task. Materials and methods: Two clinical corpora of breast cancer patients were collected from the electronic health records from the University of Minnesota (UMN) and Mayo Clinic (MC), and annotated following the same guideline. We developed three types of NLP models (i.e., CRF, BiLSTM-CRF and CancerBERT) to extract cancer phenotypes from clinical texts. We evaluated the generalizability of models on different test sets with different learning strategies (model transfer vs locally trained). The entity coverage score was assessed with their association with the model performances. Results: We manually annotated 200 and 161 clinical documents at UMN and MC. The corpora of the two institutes were found to have higher similarity between the target entities than the overall corpora. The CancerBERT models obtained the best performances among the independent test sets from two clinical institutes and the permutation test set. The CancerBERT model developed in one institute and further fine-tuned in another institute achieved reasonable performance compared to the model developed on local data (micro-F1: 0.925 vs 0.932). Conclusions: The results indicate the CancerBERT model has superior learning ability and generalizability among the three types of clinical NLP models for our named entity recognition task. It has the advantage to recognize complex entities, e.g., entities with different labels.

Indexed as

Electronic health recordsGeneralizabilityInformation extractionNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID37680211
PMCPMC10480628
OpenAlexW4386056906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.