Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680165›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Who cares for the carer? Codesigning a carer health and wellbeing clinic for older care partners of older people in Australia.

Natasha Layton, Aislinn Lalor, Susan Slatyer, Den-Ching A Lee, Christina Bryant, Moira Watson, Anjali Khushu, Elissa Burton, Déborah Oliveira, Natasha L Brusco and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Who cares for the carer? Codesigning a carer health and wellbeing clinic for older care partners of older people in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Natasha LaytonRehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-8069
Aislinn LalorRehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Susan SlatyerCentre for Healthy Ageing, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Den-Ching A LeeRehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Christina BryantMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Moira WatsonCentre for Healthy Ageing, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Anjali KhushuDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Elissa BurtonCurtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Déborah OliveiraFaculty of Nursing, Universidad Andrés Bello, Campus Viña del Mar, Viña del Mar, Chile.
Natasha L BruscoRehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Alessandro JacintoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Translacional, Faculty of Geriatric Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Elizabeth TillerDepartment of Geriatrics (Falls Prevention Service), Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Keith D HillRehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOlder carers or 'care partners' of older people experiencing care needs often provide essential support, at times while neglecting their own health and well-being. This is an increasingly frequent scenario due to both demographic changes and policy shifts towards ageing in place. Multiple community stakeholders within the care and support ecosystem hold valuable expertise about the needs of older care partners, and the programme and policy responses that may better support their health and well-being. The aim of this study was to identify the perspectives of stakeholders obtained through the codesign phase of a multicomponent research project investigating new models of care and support for older care partners suitable for the Australian context.

methodsPrinciples of codesign were used to engage a purposeful sample of older care partners, health professionals, researchers, policy makers and health service administrators. Participants took part in a series of three codesign workshops conducted remotely via video conferencing. The workshops were supported with briefing material and generated consensus-based summaries, arriving at a preferred service model.

findingsThis paper reports the research design and structure of the codesign panels, the range of findings identified as important to support the health and well-being of older carers of older people, and the resulting service model principles. The codesigned and preferred model of care is currently being prepared for implementation and evaluation in Australia. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was conducted using codesign methodology, whereby stakeholders including older care partners and others involved in supporting older carers, were integrally involved with design, development, results and conclusions.

Indexed as

CaregiversEcosystemAgedAustraliaHealth PersonnelHumansIndependent Livingcarerclinichealthmodel of carepartnershipwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID37680165
PMCPMC10632619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.