ReviewNursing open2023
Establishing an evaluation index system of nursing quality for clinical drug trials: A Delphi study.
Review in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a Nursing Quality Evaluation Indicator System for Lung Cancer in Traditional Chinese Medicine Based on the Donabedian Model: A Delphi Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Establishing an evaluation index system of nursing quality for clinical drug trials: A Delphi study.Nursing open · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo construct a quality evaluation index system for clinical drug trials nursing management and obtain the weight of all indicators.
designA mixed-method research design with a quantitative component was used, primarily qualitative.
methodsThrough a literature review and semi-structured interview, an expert consultation questionnaire on the quality of nursing evaluation indicators for clinical drug trials was developed in April 2021. Eighteen experts in clinical drug trial nursing, medical, and pharmacy conducted 2 rounds of consultation according to the Delphi method to determine the indicators for evaluating the quality of clinical drug trial nursing. The weights of each indicator were determined using analytic hierarchical analysis.
resultsThe established quality evaluation system of clinical drug trial nursing mainly includes 3 first-level indicators, 12 second-level indicators, and 59 third-level indicators. The positive coefficients of the two rounds of expert consultation were 90%-100%, and the authority coefficients were 0.831 and 0.885, respectively; the coordination coefficients were 0.189 and 0.214, respectively. The consulting results and weight settings are reliable. The evaluation index system we constructed is in line with the characteristics of the clinical drug trial nursing profession, with clear index levels and strong clinical operability, which can provide a reference for the assessment, monitoring and improvement of nursing quality in clinical drug trials. It will also clarify how nurses contribute to subjects' safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.