ArticleMedical education online2023
Effectiveness of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation procedural skills training on second-year student using modified Peyton's Four-Step approach during COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Medical education online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07530822 (The Effect Of Prenatal Care Training Using The Peyton Model On Midwifery Students' Knowledge, Skills, Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, And Satisfaction Levels), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect Of Prenatal Care Training Using The Peyton Model On Midwifery Students' Knowledge, Skills, Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, And Satisfaction Levels
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital learning of clinical skills and its impact on medical students' academic performance: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Application of a modified Peyton's four-step approach in clinical skills training for residents: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAirway emergency is the reason behind competency in mask ventilation and intubation skills for doctors. Procedural skills are taught through face-to-face training. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on the education system, including medical education. The face-to-face training method cannot be carried out and requires a modification to an online method. Therefore, Peyton's Four-Step Approach is modified to adapt this change.
objectiveAssessing the effectiveness of learning methods between modified Peyton's Four-Step approach and classic Peyton's Four Step approach in learning basic skills of mask ventilation and intubation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodThis was an experimental study with two groups of subjects in the Basic ClinicalSkills module of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation at the Faculty ofMedicine, Universitas Indonesia during February-June 2022. The first group received training with classic Peyton's Four-Step approach and another group with modified Peyton's Four-Step approach. Both groups were tested and assessed using rubric score and global rating score, and asked to fill a feedback questionnaire.
resultsThis study was conducted with 133 students in the classic group and 96 students in the modified group. The median rubric score was 21.2 for both groups and the global rating score showed 82%and 78% students passed, for classic and modified group respectively. Therubric score and global rating score, also the pass rate between two learningmethods showed no significant results (
conclusionThe learning method using modified and classic Peyton Four-StepApproach were equally effective for learning basic skill of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation for students of the Faculty of Medicine,University of Indonesia. Both methods provided equal students' satisfaction and self-confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.