Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37679951›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2023

New method of video-assisted vaginoscopy in Nellore heifers.

Gabriela Jaques Rodrigues, Bruno Moura Monteiro, Rinaldo Batista Viana, Aluizio Otavio Almeida da Silva, Francisco Décio de Oliveira Monteiro, Pedro Paulo Maia Teixeira

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriela Jaques RodriguesInstituto of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Campus Castanhal, Castanhal, Pará, Brazil.
Bruno Moura MonteiroInstitute of Health and Animal Production, Federal Rural University of the Amazon, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Rinaldo Batista VianaInstitute of Health and Animal Production, Federal Rural University of the Amazon, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Aluizio Otavio Almeida da SilvaInstituto of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Campus Castanhal, Castanhal, Pará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2384-2860
Francisco Décio de Oliveira MonteiroFederal Institute of Tocantins (IFTO), Campus Araguatins, Araguatins, Tocantins, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3598-5826
Pedro Paulo Maia TeixeiraInstituto of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Campus Castanhal, Castanhal, Pará, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaginoscopy allows an intravaginal endoscopic evaluation and can help in the diagnosis of female bovine genital tract disorders. The aim of this study is to validate a new method of gynaecological examination using a Scope VOR&GDI videovaginoscope. Twenty-six heifers were used, divided into 2 groups with 13 animals, control group (GC) and videovaginoscopic group (GV). In the CG, vaginoscopy was performed with a vaginal speculum and in the GV with a Scope VOR&GDI videovaginoscope. All heifers underwent vaginoscopy on day 0 (D0), and 9 days later, on day 9 (D9). Vaginoscopy provided adequate intravaginal inspection. In the CG, 23% (3/13) of the heifers showed discomfort during the test. In GV, vaginal inspection was better due to better image quality. The videovaginoscope is the most effective equipment for carrying out the vaginoscopy procedure in Nellore heifers, as it produces sharper and clearer images and can help in the diagnostic and therapeutic routine of veterinarians.

Indexed as

EndoscopyGynecological ExaminationAnimalsCattleFemaleintravaginal inspectionvaginal endoscopyvaginal examvaginoscopy in cowsvideodiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID37679951
PMCPMC10650372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.