Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37679891›Full record

ReviewAnimal models and experimental medicine2023

Progress in building clinically relevant patient-derived tumor xenograft models for cancer research.

Weijing Wang, Yongshu Li, Kaida Lin, Xiaokang Wang, Yanyang Tu, Zhenjian Zhuo

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Translational cancer research · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Bioprinted research models of urological malignancy.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Biomolecules · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Weijing WangDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Yongshu LiCollege of Life Sciences, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7523-3330
Kaida LinDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Xiaokang WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yanyang TuResearch Center, Huizhou Central People's Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Huizhou City, China.
Zhenjian ZhuoState Key Laboratory of Chemical Oncogenomics, School of Chemical Biology and Biotechnology, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0142-4086
Shantou University · CNGuangdong Medical College · CNLonggang Central Hospital · CNPeking University · CNShenzhen Institute of Information Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models, a method involving the surgical extraction of tumor tissues from cancer patients and subsequent transplantation into immunodeficient mice, have emerged as a pivotal approach in translational research, particularly in advancing precision medicine. As the first stage of PDX development, the patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) models implant tumor tissue in mice in the corresponding anatomical locations of the patient. The PDOX models have several advantages, including high fidelity to the original tumor, heightened drug sensitivity, and an elevated rate of successful transplantation. However, the PDOX models present significant challenges, requiring advanced surgical techniques and resource-intensive imaging technologies, which limit its application. And then, the humanized mouse models, as well as the zebrafish models, were developed. Humanized mouse models contain a human immune environment resembling the tumor and immune system interplay. The humanized mouse models are a hot topic in PDX model research. Regarding zebrafish patient-derived tumor xenografts (zPDX) and patient-derived organoids (PDO) as promising models for studying cancer and drug discovery, zPDX models are used to transplant tumors into zebrafish as novel personalized medical animal models with the advantage of reducing patient waiting time. PDO models provide a cost-effective approach for drug testing that replicates the in vivo environment and preserves important tumor-related information for patients. The present review highlights the functional characteristics of each new phase of PDX and provides insights into the challenges and prospective developments in this rapidly evolving field.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsZebrafishAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHeterograftsHumansMiceProspective StudiesXenograft Model Antitumor Assaysanimal modelcancerPDXprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID37679891
PMCPMC10614132
OpenAlexW4386530063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.