ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2023
Inclusive approaches to involvement of community groups in health research: the co-produced CHICO guidance.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- A community-based qualitative study of perspectives on alcohol public health interventions and experiences of alcohol use.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Evolution of Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in Health-Related Research: A Concept Analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Review
- Development of the RIPPLES framework for patient and public involvement in rapid evidence syntheses.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Community participation in responding to health misinformation.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Identifying innovative models of urgent care in rural coastal areas in England: the Elevate study - a mixed-methods protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- A new patient-led approach to building research infrastructure and evidence generation.Oxford open immunology · 2026Article
- Missing from the data, missing from the design: feminist co-design for equitable hormonal contraception symptom tracking.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Understanding the Scope, Intent and Extent of Published Conceptual Frameworks of Frameworks for Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research: A Rapid Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Reducing inequalities through greater diversity in clinical trials - As important for medical devices as for drugs and therapeutics.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
- Understanding Barriers and Facilitators for Ethnic Minority Groups to Audio Recording Recruitment Discussions in Clinical Trials: A Participatory Approach to Improving Informed Consent and Participation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Breaking barriers: a commentary on research gaps in cancer and depression among individuals with intellectual disabilities.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Building trust and inclusion with under-served groups: a public involvement project employing a knowledge mobilisation approach.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Review
- Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE): how valuable and how hard? An evaluation of ALL_EARS@UoS PPIE group, 18 months on.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Embedding voices of under-served communities in Health Research Priority Setting in Thailand.Wellcome open research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRacially marginalised groups are underserved in healthcare and underrepresented in health research. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is established as the method to ensure equity in health research. However, methods traditionally employed in PPIE can lead to the exclusion of some communities and exacerbation of existing inequalities, highlighting the need to develop inclusive processes for more inclusive community involvement in health research. We aimed to produce guidance to promote good practice for inclusive involvement of racially marginalised community groups in health research via public and community involvement and engagement.
methodsThe CHecklist for Inclusive COmmunity involvement in health research (CHICO) was co-produced by researchers and three Bristol-based community organisations: Dhek Bhal, My Friday Coffee Morning-Barton Hill, and Malcolm X Elders. After initial conversations and link building with community leaders to develop relationships, researchers attended at least three meetings with each community group to discuss preferred approaches to involvement. Each community group had a different format, and discussions were open and tailored to fit the groups preferences. The meetings were held in the community groups' usual meeting venue. Notes from meetings were reviewed by researchers to identify key themes, which were used to inform the creation of a draft illustration which was then taken back to the community groups for refinement and used to inform the development of written guidance and the final illustration.
resultsChecklist items were structured into three stages: (1) building relationships, (2) reciprocal relationships and (3) practicalities. Stage 1 highlights the importance of building trust with the community group over time through regular visits to community venues and talking to people informally to understand the history of the group, their preferences and needs, and topics that are likely to be of interest to them. Stage 2 focusses on maintaining a reciprocal relationship and understanding how to best to give back to the community. Stage 3 provides guidance on the practicalities of designing and running inclusive community-based involvement activities, including consideration of the venue, format, communication-style, language requirements, social activities, and provision of food.
conclusionsOur co-produced checklist can guide researchers in how to involve people from different ethnicities in health research that is relevant to their community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.