Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37679854›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2023

Inclusive approaches to involvement of community groups in health research: the co-produced CHICO guidance.

Catherine Jameson, Zehra Haq, Samira Musse, Zahra Kosar, Gloria Watson, Vikki Wylde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Community participation in responding to health misinformation.International journal for equity in health · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catherine JamesonMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Southmead Hospital, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Zehra HaqDhek Bhal, Wellspring Settlement, Barton Hill, Bristol, UK.
Samira MusseMy Friday Coffee Morning - Barton Hill, University of Bristol micro campus, Barton Hill, Bristol, UK.
Zahra KosarMy Friday Coffee Morning - Barton Hill, University of Bristol micro campus, Barton Hill, Bristol, UK.
Gloria WatsonMalcolm X Elders, Malcolm X Community Centre, St Pauls, Bristol, UK.
Vikki WyldeMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Southmead Hospital, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. V.Wylde@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-1529

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRacially marginalised groups are underserved in healthcare and underrepresented in health research. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is established as the method to ensure equity in health research. However, methods traditionally employed in PPIE can lead to the exclusion of some communities and exacerbation of existing inequalities, highlighting the need to develop inclusive processes for more inclusive community involvement in health research. We aimed to produce guidance to promote good practice for inclusive involvement of racially marginalised community groups in health research via public and community involvement and engagement.

methodsThe CHecklist for Inclusive COmmunity involvement in health research (CHICO) was co-produced by researchers and three Bristol-based community organisations: Dhek Bhal, My Friday Coffee Morning-Barton Hill, and Malcolm X Elders. After initial conversations and link building with community leaders to develop relationships, researchers attended at least three meetings with each community group to discuss preferred approaches to involvement. Each community group had a different format, and discussions were open and tailored to fit the groups preferences. The meetings were held in the community groups' usual meeting venue. Notes from meetings were reviewed by researchers to identify key themes, which were used to inform the creation of a draft illustration which was then taken back to the community groups for refinement and used to inform the development of written guidance and the final illustration.

resultsChecklist items were structured into three stages: (1) building relationships, (2) reciprocal relationships and (3) practicalities. Stage 1 highlights the importance of building trust with the community group over time through regular visits to community venues and talking to people informally to understand the history of the group, their preferences and needs, and topics that are likely to be of interest to them. Stage 2 focusses on maintaining a reciprocal relationship and understanding how to best to give back to the community. Stage 3 provides guidance on the practicalities of designing and running inclusive community-based involvement activities, including consideration of the venue, format, communication-style, language requirements, social activities, and provision of food.

conclusionsOur co-produced checklist can guide researchers in how to involve people from different ethnicities in health research that is relevant to their community.

Indexed as

Community groupsDiversityEthnic groupsGuidanceHealth researchInvolvement

Identifiers

PMID37679854
PMCPMC10486022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.