Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37679801›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2023

Descriptive ethnobotanical studies are needed for the rescue operation of documenting traditional knowledge.

Łukasz Łuczaj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Perceptions and Acceptability ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The global relevance of locally grounded ethnobiology.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Integrating depth and rigor in ethnobiological and ethnomedical research.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Łukasz ŁuczajInstitute of Biology, University of Rzeszów, ul. Zelwerowicza 4/D9, 35-601, Rzeszow, Poland. lukasz.luczaj@interia.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this essay, I claim that the primary aim of ethnobiological research is now to document disappearing traditional knowledge. This is an absolute priority due to the rate at which biocultural biodiversity in the world is disappearing. Rather than diverting our efforts into inflating the theoretical part of ethnobotany, we should concentrate on knowledge documentation to facilitate its circulation in the communties that hold it or at least to preserve it for future generations, even in the static form of databases or video recordings.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEthnobotanyKnowledgeBiocultural diversityDevolution of knowledgeEvolution of scienceKnowledge circulationTheory of scienceTraditional knowledge

Identifiers

PMID37679801
PMCPMC10486101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.